User talk:Monterrosa

I have indefinitely blocked you for continued block evasion and edit warring. It is clear that you are not here to work collaboratively with others. You can contest this block using {{unblock|your reason here}} or by emailing the ban appeals subcommittee. Tiptoety ^talk 07:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Monterrosa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea why you blocked me since I don't have another account.

Decline reason:

As far as I can tell, you're right: you don't have another account. However, you have been editing whilst logged out to deliberately avoid scrutiny, which is a violation of the sockpuppetry policy. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Misplaced unblock request

In answer to your misplaced question: when you address the issues that led to your block, and give suitable assurances that they will not occur again. There is no "expiration date"; this block will only be lifted when we are convinced that you are no longer a threat to Wikipedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:38, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so when is that? A day, week, month? please.

I've revoked your talk page access. These kinds of questions given your continuing use of IPs to evade your block are dishonest and abusive.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]