User talk:Monometro

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: MonoMetro was changed by Monometro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862375 on 2013-08-05T08:54:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MonoMetro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: MonoMetro was changed by Monometro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896239 on 2013-08-17T08:03:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing the infobox and the photo from the article? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

For cases like this, your content should be sourced. See WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:British Contract.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:British Contract.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest

Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mecca Metro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). An additional conflict of interest may be with the article MonoMetro. Thank you. --papageno (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]