User talk:Monkelese15

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Monkelese15! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 18:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall

The point of categorisation is to group together defining characteristics of articles. Though Camilla is indeed descended from these various nationalities they are all very distant. She is also, as we all are, of African descent. Descent categories are used for people where, generally their parentage, is significantly defining. If you go back to Robert III he has about 16 million descendents. The entire Royal Family is of French/Scottish/Hanoverian descent. If you really want to pursue this point please use the talk page, but I suggest you have a look at WP:OVERCAT first. Rathfelder (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Prince's Trust—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Thepenguin9 (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thepenguin9, I removed it because those two titles always needs to be updated with vital info and it hasn't been updated since 2018. I just think its not relevant. (Monkelese15 (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The timeline of the charity's events seem useful to me. If it is troublesome to update, then improve it! Change the formatting, make it a bullet list. Thepenguin9 (talk) 20:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Catherine of Aragon into Cultural depictions of Catherine of Aragon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa (talk), i didn't know it was a copyright violation if I moved a section to create a new article. Sorry about that, I should have discussed this on the talk page first. (Monkelese15 (talk)

It's not a copyright violation. It's a violation of the terms of our license.— Diannaa (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cultural depictions of Catherine of Aragon

Hello, Monkelese15,

Thank you for creating Cultural depictions of Catherine of Aragon.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

That lede had to removed. It was copied wholesale, as a block. So it clear copvio.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 21:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cultural depictions of Catherine of Aragon have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 21:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]