Jump to content

User talk:Monica Woods Writer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill MacKay (musician) (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GraziePrego (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Monica Woods Writer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Monica Woods Writer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bill MacKay (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bill MacKay (musician)[edit]

Hello, Monica Woods Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bill MacKay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill MacKay (musician) (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OnlyNanotalk 22:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill MacKay (musician) (July 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OnlyNanotalk 15:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024[edit]

Information icon

Hello Monica Woods Writer. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Monica Woods Writer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Monica Woods Writer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, Jake.
I can categorically and factually state that I have no financial or other stake in promoting Mr. MacKay's work, nor the work of any artist for that matter. He is simply one among those artists that I have noted over the years whose presence, though they have had significant attention from the public, has been lacking on Wikipedia.
To be extra clear, I have never met Mr. MacKay, nor anyone representing him in any matter whatsoever, nor been approached to work for hire, or work in any capacity for him nor for anyone related to his career.
In conclusion, thank you for seeking clarity on the creation of the article on Mr. MacKay. I hope this message provides the same.
Monica Woods Monica Woods Writer (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 18:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jake,
After some consultation with OnlyNano and much revision, I have re-submitted my article. Does this mean I should expect to wait the months-long process of submission again to see if it is accepted? There is no rush but I am simply curious about the process so that I can navigate it better.
Thank you very much
MW Monica Woods Writer (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could ask OnlyNano to re-review your submission. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 17:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I will do so. All the best.
Monica Monica Woods Writer (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill MacKay (musician) (July 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OnlyNanotalk 20:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]