User talk:Mongoletsi

August 2008

Thank you for your contribution to Truth, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 12:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patrice Evra

Your additions have already been undone. How would you like to proceed ?

Aaron carass (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Bill Hicks. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 09:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tregaron

Good catch there! Let's hope someone can start an article on the ceramicist to establish notability, else out she must go. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 02:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G-d vrs. God

Re: Satan#Judaism

The only reason why I put it as G-d was because it was under the Judaism section, and I thought it would be more appropriate for a Jewish audience, but perhaps you're right and it is not necessary. Thanks, — Jasonasosa 17:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment to Mrfivethrity

Hi. I've got several concerns about the comment you left Mrfivethirty[1]:

It's not very nice. The word "shabby" comes to mind.
It's just egging the person on.
You are "outing" a person's identity on Wikipedia. However transparent it might have been before, that's still a big no-no. I've seen editors get seriously sanctioned even for outing transparently identifiable users.
If this person comes up with an article that truly meets all our requirements (as you're saying he's threatened to do), well I say bring it on. I'm happy to have an encyclopaedic article. I'm skeptical one can be made, but if it can be, we're better off if we have it.
We model the behaviour we want to see in others.
None of us, no matter how well established we are around here, is above our norms of etiquette, even in dealing with vexatious people. That goes for you and me, just like everyone else.

Mostly, I just keep coming back to my first comment above. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In a similar vein, I'd be grateful if you'd strike the response you left to Mrfivethirty on my talkpage. Goading a blocked user by loosely comparing their contributions to a sex offender is not at all constructive. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you wanted me to "strike" as in "strike-through", or literally delete. I don't mind if you delete the comment Mongoletsi (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you want it deleted, I'm perfectly happy with a strikethrough. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

This edit [2] is not 'nonsense', it's badly written but factually correct, the Númenóreans are considered to have 'purer' blood and to be the rightful kings of men due to their ancestry from the holy Ainur, basically Tolkien's take on the God given right of hereditary monarchs. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 10:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to ceed to your obvious knowledge on the matter, and not least your username :) Mongoletsi (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

Hi Mongoletsi... thanks for joining CommOER! A newsletter with more information is coming soon. Let me know if you'd like to work on any OER articles in particular and I may be able to connect you to others with similar concerns. - Sara FB (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chemtrail conspiracy theory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The term ''chemtrail'' is a [[[portmanteau]] of the words "chemical" and "trail," just as ''contrail'' is a contraction of "

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Pearl

No, that last edit won't do either. I really have no idea what you were getting at with the "unspecified" Bachelor of Science. In any case, it seems like you are wanting to prove a negative (that he has no psychological training) but it needs a reliable source. I wouldn't have thought it would be too hard to find, but even then I'd have reservations about including it in the article - we don't normally state what people don't have degrees in. St Anselm (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable. You're asking me to prove a negative. I'm reinstating my change and the onus is now on you. Mongoletsi (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mongoletsi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mongoletsi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mongoletsi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]