User talk:Mondodi

This is Mondodi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transvestite certificate has been accepted

Transvestite certificate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George H. W. Bush broccoli comments for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George H. W. Bush broccoli comments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George H. W. Bush broccoli comments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IWI (talk) 12:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent

You do know that you are quite transparent, right? And what did you think you were going to accomplish by dropping by my talk page? Trying to bond with me? Trying to seem less suspicious?

Just letting you know now that a number of eyes are on you. And when enough evidence is gathered, you will be indefinitely blocked again. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "a number of eyes are on" me? And what type of evidence are you referring to? I commented on your talk page regarding the article in question as you are an experienced editor with an interest in the topic area, and I thought you could make that article less pointed and more NPOV. I have no desire to bond with you or anyone else on Wikipedia. --Mondodi (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Nazi genocides" page

Hello Mondodi! I'm Ezlev - you might remember that I responded to your message on the talk page for the article The Holocaust. At the time, I expressed concern about the newly created article you were suggesting a hatnote to, List of Nazi genocides. I assumed you had approved the draft article using the AfC process, and suggested that maybe the article should not have been approved.

The article has since been speedy-deleted under WP:A10, as a recently created article which duplicated the existing topic Holocaust victims without expanding upon or improving it. However, I was looking back at the events surrounding this article and realized that you don't appear to be an AfC reviewer, since you aren't on the list of participants. You've moved multiple draftspace articles into mainspace using what seems to be the AfC process, so I wanted to make sure you were aware that editors who do not meet the criteria found on the participant list page cannot be AfC reviewers, and that editors who are not on the participant list are "strongly cautioned not to review AfC submissions."

If I'm incorrect about any aspect of this situation, or if you have any questions, feel free to ping me here and let me know! Otherwise, please don't move articles from draftspace to mainspace unless you become an AfC reviewer in the future. warmly, ezlev. talk 00:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ezlev: Thank you for being so kind in explaining that to me! I wasn't aware that there was an approval process to becoming an AfC reviewer. I will hold off it for now. --Mondodi (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jordan-Hooper-AOAPJM per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jordan-Hooper-AOAPJM. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]