User talk:Monarchatto

Welcome

Hello, Monarchatto, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Monarchatto's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Podontia affinis has been accepted

Podontia affinis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pachyrhizus erosus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilocano. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Podontia manilensis

Hi, could you tell me where you found this species name? All I've found so far is a mention on iNaturalist, and nothing more. Just wondering in case it helps me find out more information on it, it's the only one left in the genus I haven't been able to verify. (Also since I'm here, thank you for creating the Podontia and Podontia affinis articles, as well as providing images for them!) Monster Iestyn (talk) 17:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don’t know, but I have a possible solution

I only found it on iNaturalist too and nothing else, which I why I put the question mark. I put it there since from my experience iNaturalist curators don’t make taxon pages just because they were asked to, I think you need to have proof that it exists (link, book, pdf etc.) and that it is valid (not a synonym, belongs in the said genus/any type of taxa, etc.) but maybe sometimes they’ll probably google it. You could message the one who created/curated Podontia manilensis if there is an option to do that. Otherwise I don’t know, if you don’t find anything else feel free to remove it. And No problem! Thank you too for adding many citations to my pages along with information! Monarchatto (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad to help. :) In that case, I'm wondering myself if it might have been included on iNaturalist by mistake somehow... without the authority or any references there's little or no way to check that though, annoyingly. 17:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Might be, but not sure. Could it be a synonym mistaken for another species?Monarchatto (talk) 03:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it was a synonym, I might have seen something referring to that at least. I'm thinking more like a species mistakenly placed in the wrong genus for some reason, a name that isn't actually in the literature at all. Something like Asiophrida manilensis might actually be the real name for instance, since apparently some Podontia species are synonyms of Asiophrida species. (See here and search for "Podontia" and/or "manilensis" and you'll see what I mean, if you're allowed to see a Snippet view of the book) This is just wild speculation to be honest, but that's the best I've got for now. Monster Iestyn (talk) 04:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it looks like it, I think it’s probably synonym of Asiophrida manilensis. If it was actually Podontia it would’ve likely been in some sort of book or journal right?Monarchatto (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it had ever been Podontia it would have been listed as a synonym somewhere. But yeah, it could be actually Asiophrida manilensis. Monster Iestyn (talk) 05:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Extremely late update to the mystery "Podontia manilensis" from two years ago, but I started a discussion on it on iNaturalist itself some months ago, and I've just finally got a response from a curator: [1]. It sounds like iNaturalist imported this name from uBio (which as far as I've heard is a dead website now), which raises more questions than it answers. In any case, it's been marked as inactive now, so it should no longer be listed on iNaturalist at all anymore. Monster Iestyn (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and references

Hello, Iestyn, can I ask you a question too? I use Google Scholar to find most of my sources. But you seem to find lots of obscure (to me at least) sources, how do you that? I am trying to find more sources for my page Phyllanthus fluitans so I can put more information in the page but I’ve only been seeing apparent medicinal papers about other Phyllanthus species (emblica, urinaria, niruri, caroliensis, etc.) Monarchatto (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having edited pages on leaf beetles for a few years now, I'm aware of quite a few people historical and present who have written articles on them (including flea beetles). I've been making lists of publications by these people over on Wikispecies, which I am more active on usually, so I can easily refer to them in case they've already written an article on the species or such. Otherwise, the main Google website or Google Books can be helpful sometimes. Another useful resource sometimes is the Biodiversity Heritage Library, which has online archives for a lot of historical publications. Monster Iestyn (talk) 17:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot! I really appreciate it!Monarchatto (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]