User talk:Mona.SHEPHERD

Mona.SHEPHERD, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mona.SHEPHERD! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Neville Maxwell, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have turned Neville Maxwell and Henderson Brooks–Bhagat Report into attack pages against the author. Zanhe (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

You have breached every rule of objectivity through your mass deletions in order to present Neville Maxwell in highly favorable light. You even removed a host of weighty citations. This is a classic case of a blatant violation of the WP:BLP policy. You obviously have some connection to Maxwell. Yet, you have the temerity to accuse me of "disruptive editing." Your mutilations speak for themselves! -Mona.SHEPHERD (talk)

In my view, Zanhe has the matter pretty much correct, and has done a good job analyzing the shortcomings of the content that Mona.SHEPHERD had tried to add.The "weighty citations" do not support the statements, or the tone and tenor of the additions. I see no basis for accusing a highly experienced editor like Zanhe of a connection to the subject. As for me, I never heard of the subject until yesterday, so have no connection whatsoever. These reversions were not "mutilations" as this is a routine content dispute in this collaborative encyclopedia. Any additions will be as the result of consensus, and I oppose what Mona.SHEPHERD has previously written. Please suggest only additions written from the neutral point of view, and fully backed by references. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)