User talk:Mollystarkdean

This is Mollystarkdean's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaeah Lee (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I'm sorry, but none of the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines. The majority of sources presented are primary and do not count towards notability guidelines to enable Jaeah Lee to have a Wikipedia article. The majority of sources are either primary sources affiliated with the subject or content written by Jaeah Lee.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Jaeah Lee specifically; books or white papers written ABOUT Jaeah Lee; television and radio features ABOUT Jaeah Lee.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for Jaeah Lee to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaeah Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jaeah Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mollystarkdean! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amisha (Amy) Padnani (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more reliable sources, As its a biography we expect more citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amisha (Amy) Padnani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 18:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neema Roshania Patel (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neema Roshania Patel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 (talk) 00:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neema Roshania Patel

Hello, Mollystarkdean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neema Roshania Patel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sandhya Kambhampati

Hello, Mollystarkdean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandhya Kambhampati, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women Do News (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Did you mean to submit this?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women Do News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women Do News has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women Do News. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 02:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick thing about moving pages

Hi Molly,

Just as a quick note, you can move pages by going to the "tools" bar on the right side of the page, and then clicking the "move" button. This will preserve the page history, which is necessary to keep proper attribution to everyone who participated in making the page. Copy-paste moves require an admin to manually merge the history of the two pages, so it's best-practice to avoid copy-paste moves.

Cheers

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jean Gaddy Wilson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jean Gaddy Wilson. Thanks! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Gaddy Wilson (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Gaddy Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandhya Kambhampati

Hello, Mollystarkdean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandhya Kambhampati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important lighting talk slides update

Howdy Mollystarkdean, just wanted to let you know that due to some venue tech limitations, we've added new requirements for slides. For convenience, they are: IF you have slides, please either upload them as PDFs to Wikimedia Commons and post a link here, bring them in on USB drives as PDFs, or, if you're using Google Slides or similar software, post a link to them here. Fortunately, the deadline is when you go on stage for your talk. Doing so will avoid tech surprises on the day of. Due to venue tech limitations, we cannot guarantee being able to show your visual aids otherwise. The lightning talk section, where the slides should be linked, is here; Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2024#Lightning talks. Thank you, and see you Sunday! Enterprisey (talk!) 20:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Julia B. Chan

Hello, Mollystarkdean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julia B. Chan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebony Reed (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebony Reed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean Gaddy Wilson

Hello, Mollystarkdean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jean Gaddy Wilson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject categories

Hi there, and thanks for your hard work and contributions. Just so you know, to add an article to a category related to Wikiproject, you would put the WP banner {{WikiProject Women Do News|class=|importance=}} on the article's talk page and that would automatically add it to the relevant category. For example, Talk:Adrienne LaFrance already has the Women Do News Wikiproject banner, and you can see it's been added to Category:WikiProject Women Do News articles. ... discospinster _talk 01:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebony Reed (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebony Reed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata WikiProject

Hello Molly, I came across your Lightning talk at the Wikidata Day for Women Do News, during my editing of the weekly Wikidata newsletter. I looked for but couldn't find a Wikidata WikiProject for Women Do News, but I would like to put it in the Wikidata community spotlight. What do you think about creating a Wikidata:WikiProject/Women Do News to support creation and enrichment of Wikidata items for associated Wikipedia articles on women journalists? I think it could be helpful as there are many Wikidata-experts who don't edit or contribute to Wikipedia so much, and vice-versa. Kind regards,-Danny Benjafield (WMDE) (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Danny Benjafield (WMDE) This is a great idea! I brought it up with the WDN board and they agree. Mollystarkdean (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to create a Wikidata project for WDN. Is it a process different from making the Wikiproject?

@Mollystarkdean Hi Molly! This youtube video (Developing a Wikidata WikiProject) is a good introduction. A stark difference would be the data model, which can be thought of as the base template of information each item your project wants to create or expand should or aims to contain. It might be Properties such as:

Sex/Gender
Birthplace
Birthdate
Country of Citizenship
Occupation
Image
Field of work
Awards received
has written for
employer
languages spoken, written or signed
educated at
Place of death
Date of death
Identifiers to external sites

This is just an idea based on existing Wikidata items of famous female journalists, you may wish to include other properties. An example of a female-focused Wikiproject Data Model can be seen here: WikiProject Aotearoa Asian Artists. If you are unsure about starting a new WikiProject or perhaps there is an existing WikiProject addressing gender bias on Wikidata/Wikipedia (such as WikiProject Women or Women in Red), perhaps WDN could join and fork off from these.

There is also the Project chat where you can ask any questions and get answers from the community. I hope some of this information is helpful! -Danny Benjafield (WMDE) (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women Do News

Women Do News is a project, not an article category. Discospinster explained to you above (#Wikiproject categories) how to tag an article's talk page to the project. I've removed the incorrect categories that you've added to the articles. Schazjmd (talk) 21:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You stopped me from doing this for other articles. Mollystarkdean (talk) 21:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yumi Wilson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yumi Wilson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pridemanty (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maren Machles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maren Machles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pridemanty (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gnarls Narwhal

Hello, Mollystarkdean

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gnarls Narwhal for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gnarls Narwhal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gnarls Narwhal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnarls Narwhal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ornov Ganguly TALK 03:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]