User talk:MoldyOne

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. This is intentional.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
Don't edit war. Except in cases of clear-cut vandalism, do not revert changes to a page more than 3 times within a 24 hour period.
If your edits are undone (reverted), go to the article's talk page to discuss them.

Ian.thomson (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your recent editing history at List of ArmaLite rifles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and they have reverted my Edits repeatedly as well and i have provided information showing the facts, they refuse to accept and continue to revert it with misleading and false information— Preceding unsigned comment added by MoldyOne (talk • contribs)

Doesn't matter! In the past 24 hours, I'm counting three (1 2 3) reverts by you, and a fourth one less than 26 hours out. It does not matter if you think you're right and they're wrong, that's not how this place works.

Go to Talk:List of ArmaLite rifles and discuss matters there (in a civil manner with the assumption of good faith from other parties). Do not change "assault rifle" to "semi-automatic rifle" again until there is consensus on the article's talk page to do so. If you revert again, I will block you. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can indent your posts by putting one or more colons (":") at the beginning of the paragraph. You need to sign your posts using four tiles (~~~~). Ian.thomson (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]