User talk:Moinmka

Your draft article, Draft:Showbiz Pakistan

Hello, Moinmka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Showbiz Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Hania Amir have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 11:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Meiraj haq

Hello, Moinmka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meiraj haq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Showbiz Pakistan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Showbiz Pakistan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:58F8:CFF:FE3A:2E35 (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janice Tessa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janice Tessa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Tessa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BookishReader (talk) 12:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

janice tessa is well known actress Moinmka (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this article and information is provided by janice tessa herself Moinmka (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Janice Tessa. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --MuZemike 14:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Moinmka (talk) 14:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meiraj Haq

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meiraj Haq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Noneate (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Moinmka

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Moinmka has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moinmka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i never self promoted or anything like that. I gathered data and added on Wikipedia after research. I added for them because they are famous people in Pakistan Moinmka (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you can see nothing wrong in your edits, there are no grounds to remove the block. PhilKnight (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay apologies

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moinmka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

will never do it again. Agreed please unblock Moinmka (talk) 15:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moinmka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the Admins of Wikipedia,

I am writing to respectfully request an unblock for my Wikipedia account ([Your Username]). I acknowledge the reasons for my block and would like to assure the reviewing administrators that I have a clear understanding of the situation that led to my block. I understand that my previous actions may have caused damage and disruption to Wikipedia, and I deeply regret any inconvenience my actions may have caused.

I want to assure you that I am committed to making valuable contributions to Wikipedia and being a positive member of the community. I have taken the time to review the guidelines and policies that I violated, and I am fully committed to adhering to them in the future. My intention is to ensure that my future contributions are in line with the standards and goals of Wikipedia, and that they contribute positively to the community's efforts.

I sincerely apologize for any past mistakes and promise that I have learned from them. I humbly request that you consider lifting the block on my account, as I am eager to prove that I can be a responsible and productive contributor to Wikipedia.

Thank you for taking the time to review my unblock request. I look forward to the opportunity to once again contribute to this valuable resource.

Sincerely,

[Your Name] [Your Wikipedia Username] [Your Contact Information (if applicable)] Moinmka (talk) 08:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am summarily declining this request because it was clearly written by an AI. It's not an AI that is blocked, it is you. We want to hear from you. Please write a request in your own words- you also might want to tell the AI this wouldn't work to get it unblocked anyway, as it gives a lot of general platitudes while telling us nothing about your conduct. Please discuss your conduct and what was wrong with it. 331dot (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.