Jump to content

User talk:Mofhghj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
USER PAGE TALK PAGE GUEST BOOK USER BOXES MY SANDBOX CONTRIBUTED/WATCHED

Archives

[edit]

Mofhghj, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mofhghj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Congrats! You have an original barnstar 7hghhhyyyjyj (talk) 01:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philippines–San Marino relations for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines–San Marino relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines–San Marino relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for an indefinite period

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nick-D (talk) 23:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mofhghj (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

(VERY STRICT REASON)I'm sorry for have a bad luck for wikipedia is dosen't i vandal the aticles or templates I just add the articles. for wiki users to not very difficult to add the wikipedia articles Nick-D and is not easy to add the wikipedia articles,So now Nick-D you unblocked me or not Thank you read my reason. --Mofhghj (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for block evasion; you'll need to request unblock from your original account. Also, this request is incomprehensible. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm blocking these accounts as you are using them to evade the block of the Holy Child Student account. This account was blocked for copyright infringements, which have continued under the subsequent accounts. You are wasting your time by doing the same thing over and over. Please step back, read the relevant Wikipedia policies carefully, and if you would like to return to editing make a request at Holy Child Student. Such a request should clearly explain how you will abide by Wikipedia policies in the future. It really takes me seconds to delete all your edits, so you're wasting a lot of your time for no returns at all. Nick-D (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]