User talk:Modulato

From a blocked sockpuppet

avvocato SUPDI ISSEA ZUGO Leggo i suoi scritti che sono pieni di errori ed inesattezze e mi permetto di precisare quanto segue:

Issea non vende titoli ma certifica e riconosce l'esperienza professionale pregressa ai sensi della legge federale e della direttiva VAE e tutti gli studenti sono tenuti a superare esami e preparare una tesi. Non è quindi un diploma mill. Scriverlo non è una informazione corretta. L'accreditamento in Svizzera è una semplice certificazione di qualità non obbligatoria, un marchio di qualità che non è necessario per svolgere l'attività universitaria.Non deve quindi essere confuso con un riconoscimento giuridico che è dato dalla Costituzione federale. Percio' Issea , in quanto riconosciuta dall'ordinamento giuridico svizzero , puo' rilasciare titoli universitari legittimamente anche se non è accreditata. L'accreditamento inoltre non è necessario per il riconoscimento internazionale conformemente alla Convenzione di Lisbona del Consiglio di Europa del 1997 , non essendo citato come requisito legalmente vincolante. Issea non è mai stata condannata per pubblicità ingannevole, in quanto il TAR Lazio con sentenza n. 14207 /07 ha annullato il provvedimento dell'Autorità Garante ,accertando che non c'è mai stata alcuna pubblicità ingannevole e che le informazioni contenute mel sito erano conformi alla verità. Il Consiglio di Stato di Roma con sentenza del 3 Dicembre 2018 ha riformato la sentenza del Tar Lazio annullandola,dichiarando che le note del Miur impugnate, devono essere considerate semplici pareri non assimilabili ad un provvedimento motivato e quindi non vincolanti giuridicamente. La sentenza quindi è stata favorevole a Issea. La sentenza del Tar Campania del 2021 non è definitiva non essendo ancora scaduto il termine per l'appello. L'avvocato Massimo Silvestri è stato iscritto nell'Albo degli avvocati del Foro di Milano e si è cancellato a seguito del trasferimento da Milano in Svizzera. La legge italiana sulla professione di avvocato prevede che il titolo si conservi e quindi l'avv.Silvestri lo usa legittimamente. Ingenerare sospetti di un abuso non è informazione corretta. L'elenco delle scuole riconosciute da Swissuniversities secondo la sentenza del Tribunale amministrativo Federale del 2013 non è esaustivo e non è giuridicamente vincolante. La sentenza ha confermato che Issea è un istituto universitario riconosciuto dall'ordinamento giuridico svizzero che puo' svolgere l'attività universitaria senza alcuna necessità di accreditamento, che deve essere considerato semplice marchio o certificato di qualità facoltativo. Per quanto riguarda la denominazione " scuola universitaria privata a distanza"essa è stata approvata dal Registro di Commercio federale ed è conforme alla legge federale LPSU. Molte note pubblicate che fanno riferimento a vendita di titoli, o a istituti terzi, non hanno nulla a che vedere con Issea, che opera legalmente in Svizzera dal 1987. Se lei non ha intenti pregiudizialmente denigratori nei confronti di Issea pubblicherà queste precisazioni ,se non lo farà sarà chiaro come mai.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Massilver (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello again. I don't speak Italian I just used Google Translate, but why do you call Wikipedia a criminal organization? 2603:6000:D00C:6722:5047:A1DA:10ED:487E (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

because whoever publishes defamatory news is a criminal 79.54.131.100 (talk) 13:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

La Voce di New York and WP:COI

Can you please state unequivocally that you have no WP:COI whatsoever in La Voce di New York? Passani (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@Passani: This admin thinks that this statement was pretty unequivocal. —C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Well, nobody has no COI in any of the 6M+ WP articles. You'll have to agree with me on that one. I only asked for a specific statement that there is no COI in the VNY article. Passani (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

😂 you work with the website while you accuse me of having a COI: https://www.lavocedinewyork.com/author/luca-passani/ Unbelievable. —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 07:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

You must have a problem understanding English. I did not accuse you of anything, I've just asked a simple questions which you have repeatedly avoided to answer so far. Can you state unequivocally that you have no WP:COI whatsoever in La Voce di New York? Passani (talk) 11:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Passani: Drop the stick. By repeatedly asking Modulato if he has a conflict of interest—and implying that he does have a COI if he doesn't issue a denial to your satisfaction—you are making an accusation of a conflict of interest. I don't see anything in Modulato's conduct that indicates a COI. Unless you're prepared to provide diffs that show some clear behaviour, these repeated questions about COI are starting to look like harassment. —C.Fred (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think that this debate has come to a natural end. It has not come to an end at all. I find it suspicious that a user who has formidable experience with Wikipedia editing and process (but little or no track record!) has used the last ten days with the sole objective of taking down my article. This is why I asked for confirmation that there is no WP:COI. Also, s/he is free to leave my question unanswered. In which capacity are you getting involved in this debate, if I can ask? Passani (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Required notice: Administrators' noticeboard discussion

Please be advised that I have mentioned you in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents thread titled User:Passani and ad-hominem attacks. —C.Fred (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

And made cider inside her inside.

There's a page for that: Auto-brewery syndrome Jamplevia (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Il testo della canzone: "Vengo a Prenderti questa sera" .... , recitava .... ,

Burkino Faso

I won't revert but I suggest that your most recent edit to Università Popolare degli Studi di Milano takes away from the impact of the preceding text rather than adds to it, because it is pretty trivial information and that you are scratching around for another pebble to throw. "Case dismissed with plaintiff ordered to pay costs" is usually regarded as the coup de grâce in legal cases and nothing more needs to be said. I recommend that you remove it. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

University of the People

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Pre-accreditation status of the University of the People

This message is for the person who reverted my factual information. FYI...the pre-accreditation status DOES exist for University of the People...said so right on the website of the U.S. Department of Education (according to the text on the U.S. Department of Education website, "Accreditor - WASC Senior College and University Commission Preaccredited since (06/25/2021)." See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Department_of_Education_-_University_of_the_People.png.

In the future, please check yourself to ensure that the information that has been provided by an editor aligns with the factual reporting of the accreditation status of an educational institution. Not about preference...but only the facts that need to provided to public users and readers. →Lwalt ^♦ talk 05:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The accreditor itself states it is a "candidate", not "preaccredited": https://www.wscuc.org/directory/ —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 01:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Mirrors and Forks Spam

Hello, I'm SimoneBilesStan. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

You should address your own issues first: WP:COI, WP:SPA, WP:SOCK. —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 01:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

it.wikipedia

I'm curious as to why there is no Università Popolare degli S. di M. article on Italian Wikipedia? Shouldn't you write it? There is an article IT:Università Popolare di Milano that refers to it, I think (I'm depending on Google Translate). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

@John Maynard Friedman: on the whole, it.wiki doesn't consider diploma mills relevant (there might be a few exceptions though). If I remember correctly, after a vote, they decided to create an article about the old UPM (currently inactive) but not a more specific article about the diploma mill that claims to be the successor of the UPM, which however is briefly discussed in a section. Anyway, IMO the old UPM is barely relevant: it's no coincidence that the article is short and basically nobody managed to find relevant sources. —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 05:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Modulato (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't have, and don't need, any sockpuppets; where is the list of differential edits? —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 05:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Blablubbs (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Modulato, I was surprised to read about this block given your track record but, as third party appeals are not allowed and I don't know the background, I don't propose to intervene. But I wondered if you had read wp:Appealing a block, specifically

Q2: I don't understand why I was blocked. A2: You may have breached a behavior rule without knowing it. The block notice contains the reason why an administrator has blocked you from editing, usually with a link to a policy or guideline; read it carefully and try to understand how your behavior did not follow the policy. A block is not intended as punishment; it's meant to prevent you from making further disruptive edits, either in good faith or as vandalism. If you can show that you won't continue the behavior, the block should be lifted. If you don't understand some detail of the policy, you can ask the administrator that blocked you for any clarification about their actions, and they're expected to answer your questions. Don't make such requests within the unblock request, though, as it should be used only when you already understand the reasons for the block and are ready to appeal and explain.

which seems to suggest that you need to address your question directly to GeneralNotability rather than give it as the reason for your unblock request. Best wishes for a speedy and amicable resolution.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 01:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Issea Supdi allegation

Issea does not sell qualifications but certifies and recognizes previous professional experience under federal law and the VAE directive and all students are required to pass exams and prepare a thesis. It is therefore not a mill diploma. Writing it is not correct information. Accreditation in Switzerland is a simple non-compulsory quality certification, a quality mark that is not necessary to carry out university activities and must therefore not be confused with a legal recognition that is given by the Federal Constitution. Therefore Issea, as recognized by the Swiss legal system, can legitimately issue university degrees even if it is not accredited. Accreditation is also not necessary for international recognition in accordance with the 1997 Lisbon Convention of the Council of Europe, as it is not mentioned as a legally binding requirement. Issea has never been convicted of misleading advertising, as the Lazio Regional Administrative Court with sentence no. 14207/07 canceled the provision of the Guarantor Authority, ascertaining that there has never been any misleading advertising and that the information contained on the site was in accordance with the truth. The Council of State of Rome with a sentence of 3 December 2018 reformed the sentence of the Lazio TAR by annulling it, declaring that the disputed Miur notes must be considered simple opinions that cannot be assimilated to a reasoned provision and therefore not legally binding. The ruling was therefore in favor of Issea. The decision of the Campania Tar of 2021 is not final as the deadline for the appeal has not yet expired. Massimo Silvestri was enrolled in the Milan Bar Association and canceled following his transfer from Milan to Switzerland. The Italian law on the profession of lawyer provides that the title is preserved and therefore the lawyer Silvestri uses it legitimately. Raising suspicions of abuse is not correct information. The list of schools recognized by Swissuniversities according to the 2013 Federal Administrative Court ruling is not exhaustive and is not legally binding. The ruling confirmed that Issea is a university institution recognized by the Swiss legal system that can carry out university activities without any need for accreditation, which must be considered a simple mark or optional quality certificate. As regards the name "private distance university school", it has been approved by the Federal Commercial Register and complies with the federal law LPSU. Many notes published that refer to the sale of securities, or to third-party institutions, have nothing to do with Issea, which has legally operated in Switzerland since 1987. If you have no prejudicial intentions against Issea you will publish these clarifications, if not. will make it clear why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.8.136.41 (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)