User talk:Mobile Chicane

Image tagging for Image:Brands in the wet.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Brands in the wet.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Yamaha Past Masters

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Yamaha Past Masters, by Evb-wiki (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Yamaha Past Masters is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Yamaha Past Masters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaha Past Masters

Did you explore the links I provided on my user talk page when we discussed the article? You have expanded the text, but have done little to assert importance so its possible this may still be a candidate for speedy deletion. More critically, even if not speedy deleted, it doesn't cite to any independent, reliable sources which verify its content—the standard for notability on Wikipedia. As this is an encyclopedia (a tertiary source that synthesizes other sources) all content must not be original research; it must synthesize information that is already published (but not copy, which would be a copyright violation). Articles that are not speedy deleted may still be deleted after debate at WP:AFD. Since the article in its present form does not address the problems I advised you of, don't be suprised if it is deleted again (but not by me). If you want to repost, you can move the article into the mainspace by clicking the [move] tab at the upper right, and choose the name.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]