User talk:Mmoneil1/sandbox

Peer Review

There's obviously a lot more information here than the existing article. The two big things I found were:

Read over for grammatical errors For example, you used "it's" instead of the correct "its" early on.
Maybe less citations. If multiple sentences in a row come from the same source, just cite it once at the end of the last sentence.

LiaElf76 (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely a lot more information than the original article. Overall great job and nicely laid out and organized. Check grammatical errors. (Mchamilt708 (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]

This looks really great! I can't speak on gramatical and punctual errors because I myself a aqful at those topics, but I know we all have them. Your taxo-box looks great and the picture is good. Organization looks great too. I don't get lost in your page. MarinaBarrineau (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)MarinaBarrineau[reply]

Your page is really coming together! It looks very professional and you added a lot of important information. You were lucky enough to pick an organism that had a lot of previous sources on it. I guess the only suggestion I have is to move the picture of your Butterfly Ray to the top of the page. --Kamskiba (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]