User talk:Mlan321/sandbox

Lange's Peer Review

I think the your sandbox looks quite good! There are however a couple things that I think could be changed to improve your article. In a couple sections I saw areas where there are a couple of sources that are primary, and if my memory is correct you should try and use mainly secondary sources such as reviews.

Another thing that I think could possibly be changed up is the structure of your paragraphs. I think grouping all of the sections about different types of MRSA should be put together, and the sports and race categories put closer together to each other.

Other than looking for more secondary sources and a little bit of structural changes, I think your sources are unbiased, and seem reliable.

Mlan321 Peer Review

Nice work. You did a very good job and included a significant amount of information with ample amounts of resources. You began with a good lead section, had clear structure with balanced coverage, and the content was neutral and reliable.

There was one part in the LA-MRSA section, however, where you said, “Reports suggest…” Instead of being vague and saying only “reports,” use the actual report that said it, and maybe add an in-text citation. Also, as previously stated, secondary sources are much better than primary sources. CoffeeBeanJake (talk) 20:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)