User talk:Mkonji128

License tagging for File:080101 NEW 31st MEU LOGO.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:080101 NEW 31st MEU LOGO.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Japanese woman bows to incoming Marines on Oshima Island.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Japanese woman bows to incoming Marines on Oshima Island.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Marines of the 31st MEU help Japanese fisherman move debris.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Marines of the 31st MEU help Japanese fisherman move debris.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encroachment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Camp Schwab, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Josh3580_talk/hist 06:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following Josh3580's comments, I notice a number changes to the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma article that change the asserted facts, but do not introduce any references. This edit, for instance, sounds great but the information now diverges from the reference in the article. This edit as well is quite controversial and needs a reference to remain in the article. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page. Cheers. Computermacgyver (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Josh3580 and Computermacgyver! Great to see you here. Those many changes took a great deal of time and energy, and if you were not satisfied with them, the appropriate thing to do is probably to ask me to explain, or provide additional references beyond what was already provided. I believe I provided sufficient references for every change. If you have further questions, simply ask, rather than go back and forth with edits, which wastes both our time! I've found in the years I've studied and worked on the Futenma situation that there are many assumptions which those who are not familiar with the situation on the ground ignore either willingly or ignorantly. An example is the aircraft hard landing near the Okinawa International University. The aircraft pilot identified a mechanical issue, chose an empty field to set down it, did so, and the aircraft caught on fire post landing. There was no crash. And there were no injuries. And the aircraft did not hit any buildings. Yet somehow in edits you reviewed, you let stand the claim that the 'aircraft spiraled into the main administration building of OIU'. Simply put, that is an inaccurate statement. Another example is the claim that the Okinawans are the protestors. The Okinawan people themselves will tell you that just because the protest takes place in Okinawa, doesn't mean that the participants are Okinawan. They are often from the mainland - and those assumptions need to be challenged. Finally, there is no connection at all between some of the crimes and Futenma. Why someone would feel the need to connect them on Wikipedia is beyond me, but again, it needs correction. Please let me know if you have any further questions, and together, we can help Wikipedia have accurate information vs. misleading or outright errors. Thanks! You can contact me any time here on talk.

Mkonji128, I appreciate the effort to clean up the article, and I agree on the OIU (although most sources seem to say on the campus/grounds of OIU). The issue, however, is that your personal judgment (or mine) isn't want matters here. Wikipedia requires reliable sources. I'm therefore very concerned about your removal of referenced statements from the article without providing any alternative references. The removal of information about the May 2010 protests. I saw your edit comment that, "Correcting inaccurate information - protests have never reached the claimed numbers, protestors are not from Okinawa, and other inaccuracies." If you have a source to back this up, I'm happy to see it go, but the existing statement is sourced from both a local newspaper and a US Military publication (Stars and Stripes). In the absence of a reliable source contradicting these, the statement should not be removed. Similar caution extends to the other referenced statements you removed:

The head of the Nago municipal assembly responded that "what the governor has done is unforgivable. Residents who are opposed will surely resort to the use of force, such as blocking roads to stop this from happening."Controversial US airbase in Okinawa gets green light". DW. 27 December 2013. Retrieved 28 December 2013.[1]
This was and remains a controversial decision, since the projected site involved construction on a coral reef and seagrass beds which are the habitat of the dugong, an endangered marine mammal protected under Japanese and U.S. law.Egelko, Bob (5 August 2004). "Imperiled mammal threatened by plan for Okinawa base, Court in S.F. hears activists advocate applying U.S. law". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 24 July 2006.[2]
Over 2,000 citizens responded immediately with a protest in front of the prefectural administration building, with around 1,000 forcing their way into the building to stage a sit-in. "Okinawa base foes protest governor's OK of offshore fill work for Futenma replacement". Japan Times. Kyodo. 27 December 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2014.[3]

Each of these statements is referenced and removing any of them requires a verifiable source pointing to an error in the current reference. If you can provide these, I'm very happy to see these statements removed, but if not I think they need to stay.

In other instances some of your edits changed text without changing/adding a reference. I don't personally have a problem with any of them, but Wikipedia requires references. If you could take a little bit more time to provide these references, I'm sure the article would be greatly improved. Computermacgyver (talk)

P.S. Please respond on the article's talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Computermacgyver (talk • contribs) 09:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced information camp foster

I was shocked to see that at Camp Foster you deleted an entire section of carefully assembled reliably sourced info with the edit summary "removed old information" and replaced uit with a new totally different section ( Land Return) It is ok to add, but NEVER ok to delete without a reason.

The information is neither "old" nor WP:DATED. looking at your other removals mentioned above I see a pattern of wonder if you WP:DONTLIKE this type of information. I am restoring teh paragraph you deleted and am looking forward to hear from you, to understand.--Wuerzele (talk) 20:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as 3rd Marine Expeditionary Brigade (United States). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/31st Marine Expeditionary Unit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]