User talk:Mkj1413

Articles for deletion nomination of Jewels and Binoculars

I have nominated Jewels and Binoculars, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewels and Binoculars. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JewelsandBinoculars.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:JewelsandBinoculars.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I nominated an article of yours for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now Aint The Time for Your Tears. Joe Chill (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Genuine Royal Albert Hall Concerts

I have nominated The Genuine Royal Albert Hall Concerts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Genuine Royal Albert Hall Concerts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Now Ain't The Time for Your Tears cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Now Ain't The Time for Your Tears cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A

The article From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability--there are hundreds of Dylan boots.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Newport to the Ancient Empty Streets of L.A(3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]