User talk:Mkench17

Greetings

Hey--ggwp (talk) 00:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arcadia Fund has been accepted

Arcadia Fund, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

problems with the draft

You're presenting the grants made by the fund in two different graphs, giving the same information: grants per year and cumulative grants are actually the same data; duplicating it is the way an expansive press release would be written, but not an encyclopedia article. Additionally graphs, even a single grqaph, are inappropriate as a way of presenting what is actually a data tsble--it's visual clutter. he way an expansive press release would be written, but not an encyclopedia article

The text is also written using promotional adjectives and flowery phrases, The long section on activities and the list of selected large grants are also excessive detail. This is not the place for PR.

Please rewrite the article appropriately, or I shall.

(It's not your fault, but the article should not have been accepted from draft; it was accepted by a now banned member of a paid editing ring, who was engaged in accepting articles written by his sockpuppets and accepted unrelated articles also that did not really meet our standards). DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)