User talk:Mjf1987

February 2010

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WWE NXT, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Bell (physio)

The article Kevin Bell (physio) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable physical therapist

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 17:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mjf1987, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PDCook (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Kevin Bell (physio). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kevin Bell (physio)

I have nominated Kevin Bell (physio), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Bell (physio). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PDCook (talk) 13:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Bell (physio)

A tag has been placed on Kevin Bell (physio) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 21:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rock

Please leave The Rock as part of the main roster.

They only booked him to be in the main event of Wrestlemania A YEAR IN ADVANCE!

This shows WWE/Rock have a long term agreement, and that The Rock is gonna be a focal point of Raw for a year.

This is more than a "show up every so often" guest host thing.

Vjmlhds 14:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I did not notice the talk page but i have now seen and commented

regards

Mjf1987 (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Nash

Look, knock off the nonsense with Kevin Nash.

He is feuding with CM Punk, and they are clearly pushing him as a wrestler. He was set for a match with Punk, but a health issue got in the way.

Other talent is for people who have a clearly defined role other than a wrestler.

Ricardo Rodriguez first and foremost is Del Rio's ring announcer, Vickie Gurerro is Ziggler's manger first and foremost. HHH is the main authority figure first and foremost.

Nash's role? Feuding with, and beating up CM Punk.

Knock it off with putting him in other talent, unless he has a clearly defined non-wrestling role.

Thank you.

Vjmlhds 18:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look you are the only one on the talk page who is against it, he has not competed in a match in 4 weeks, how about you compromise and keep on other on air employees their till he works a match instead of throwing your toys out of the pram when you don't get your own way, its not your article.

I am more than happy for Kevin Nash to go on the main roster when he competes in a match but for now he is an old man attacking CM Punk who is only on a legends contract

Mjf1987 (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. He is listed on the Raw roster on WWE.com

2. They obviously intend for him to be a wrestler, since they booked a match at the PPV

3. An injury took him out of the match.

4. If he's getting in the ring and beating up one of your biggest stars in the highest profile feud in the company, that should cleary indicate that WWE is pushing Nash as a competitor, not a manager, or announcer, or sidekick, or any non physical role.

YOU sir are the one who is throwing his toys around, the room having a temper tantrum about not getting his way.

You need to be more reasonable. Other Talent is for secondary, non physical members of the roster. You're in there powerbombing a guy almost every week, then you're part of the main cast.

Common Sense.

Vjmlhds 01:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you are the only one who didn't agree with putting him in other employees on the wwe talk page till he was involved in a match, and when you didn't get your own way you changed things back, you sure its me who doesn't like getting his own way? Its not as though you have not done this thing before with Jerry Lawler or The Rock.

You are really over thinking this mate, your trying to predict might happen in coming months regarding Nash, as soon as he competes in a match feel free to move him but to date he is not an active in ring competitor. We all know the WWE writers can change storylines in an instant so there's no guarentee he will end of competing in a match.

Mjf1987 (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, Lawler for a good while was wrestling pretty much every week, feuding with the Miz, and wrestling for the WWE Title on PPV, so during that period of time, he was elevated to the main roster. Once the Cole feud died down, he went back in the broadcasters section (a section I created BTW) and has been there ever since, with no problem.

With the Rock, once it became apperent he'd be laying low for awhile, he went back into the legends section (another one of my creations), again with no problems.

With Nash, he came in right from the get-go attacking Punk, clearly building to a match, which was confirmed for Night of Champions.

Now an injury derailed that a bit, but there should be no doubt that Nash was brought in to be a wrestler (the Johnny Ace endorsed storyline contract and being added to the Raw roster on WWE.com should leave really no doubt).

It's a case by case thing.

Vjmlhds 18:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Rock on the roster

Please don't take the Rock off the Raw roster.

WWE.com lists him as an official member of Raw, so there should be no ambiguity.

Here it is in living color. Rock is part of the Raw roster.

OK, he's away shooting movies, so what? He's under contract to WWE where he makes X amount of appearances and wrestles X amount of times.

It's not like Vince McMahon or Triple H who have other jobs within the company. Rock appears when he's supposed to appear, and what he does "off the clock" is irrelevant to his WWE status.

Bottom line, if WWE counts him as part of the roster, so should we.

Vjmlhds 19:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Select Group Referees may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

League Cup]]. The panel was established in 2001, when referees in England became professional.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/1386841.stm Football referee's turn professional</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to cite sources!

I've reverted your edit to Chris Foy (referee) because you did not cite a reliable source. Given the nature of the claim, we really need to cite a newspaper or news service that has reported the story. —C.Fred (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Professional Game Match Officials Board, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chris Foy and Steve Dunn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mjf1987. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mjf1987. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mjf1987. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mike Jones (referee), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mjf1987. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]