User talk:Mjbmr/Archive 3

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Baluchi language stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Baluchi language stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaclyn Hales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline.

• Please note that redirects are not articles. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cody Strong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Cody Strong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahul^{Text me} 19:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ Sennett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock, Viral and Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Notability re DOTY

"Also, being the subject of a Wikipedia article is only a minimum requirement for inclusion in a Wiki-calendar article. Not all people meet the more stringent notability requirements for Wiki-calendar articles." (see [1]). Quis separabit? 15:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@User:Rms125a@hotmail.com Did you check the link I have added? Mjbmr (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

What link? Where? Quis separabit? 15:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@User:Rms125a@hotmail.com The one you're removing. Mjbmr (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

OH. You said link (you mean wikilink to Stuart Edge) Yes, I am afraid I have. Quis separabit? 15:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@User:Rms125a@hotmail.com You see it is a separate article about a notable person which the policy you have refered, confirms that. Mjbmr (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@ Yes, I see -- and that is provided for, again, in this directive: "Also, being the subject of a Wikipedia article is only a minimum requirement for inclusion in a Wiki-calendar article. Not all people meet the more stringent notability requirements for Wiki-calendar articles." DO NOT READD IT. Quis separabit? 15:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@User:Rms125a@hotmail.com →‎ {{specify}} don't see it? Mjbmr (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

NO?? "Also, being the subject of a Wikipedia article is only a minimum requirement for inclusion in a Wiki-calendar article. Not all people meet the more stringent notability requirements for Wiki-calendar articles." I am not going to engage in edit warring with you over nonsense. Quis separabit? 15:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited JStuStudios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Liberty High School and The Classical Academy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kate McWilliams page

Since this story has been proven untrue and also considering its insignicance, it is proposed that this page be deleted. TTFTAKM (talk) 08:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Please you are editing this page to make it false. Please do NOT delete bits that are relevant and disprove you and your article! The truth is surely more important?! TTFTAKM (talk) 09:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mjbmr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Justin Stuart

Hi, I'm Devopam. Mjbmr, thanks for creating Justin Stuart!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please go through WP:CS and change the references to reflect the same.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Devopam (talk) 12:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Devopam: Not sure what's the issue, if you can give an example. Mjbmr (talk) 12:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@Mjbmr:, I have cleaned up quite a few of them for you. It is advised to keep the citation inline and not inside the reflist. Reflist should be empty in order for it to be dynamically generated and used. It has ease of maintenance etc. as specified in WP:CS that I mentioned earlier. Please do the needful for rest and remove the tag or leave a note for me to do the same. Devopam (talk) 13:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of OmarGoshTV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OmarGoshTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmarGoshTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

OmarGoshTV

Just a note that I've moved the draft you created at User:Mjbmr/OmarGoshTV to Wikipedia's main article space. The article is now located at OmarGoshTV. During the course of the deletion discussion (AfD) for this article, located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmarGoshTV, another user significantly edited the article close to the time before the AfD discussion was closed, changing the article's scope from being about the web-based show to a biographical article about Omar Arafat, who appears to be a different subject.

The first edit that changed the article occurred on 04:03, 30 January 2017, and the last occurred on 04:09, 30 January 2017. As such, the last three !votes in the AfD discussion were based upon the scope of the article about the different subject, rather than the subject matter of the original article that you created. So, your article is back in main namespace. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

For more information and context regarding this matter, see User talk:MrProEdits § January 2017 and a note that another administrator left atop the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmarGoshTV. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Apologies

Hello Mjbmr, I didn't realize the scope of what happened when you first pinged me until I got the other pings and looked at the other discussion about the matter. Just wanted to apologize for voting for delete on the article you created, as I had not delved too much into the hijacking when I voted and just merely assumed it wasn't of merit due to the face of it. Fully my fault in voting for delete since I didn't look further into it and didn't understand what you meant by this. If you would like any assistance in the article I will be glad to help when I can. Again I'm very sorry and will take note of this for future discussions. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 02:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Adog104 No apology needed but that's nice of you, it wasn't a big deal, thanks for sticking around and helping. :) Mjbmr (talk) 11:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mohsen Yeganeh Nafashaye Bihadaf album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mohsen Yeganeh Nafashaye Bihadaf album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Mjbmr, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 06:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Schwede66 Thanks for checking out my edits and for helping, wish you all the best! Mjbmr (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Pleasure. Keep up the good work. If unsure about anything, feel free to ping me. Schwede66 07:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

lower-greek

Hi Mjbmr. As the creator of this page, I am hoping you can tell me how to fix these "lower-greek" on this template. I imagine that someone copy-pasted this to use the script but then failed to adapt it. I tried replacing "lower-greek" with the word "nota", but it then says that "" could not be found. Any help will be most appreciated. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

I managed to fix it, thanks. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of ThatWasEpic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ThatWasEpic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThatWasEpic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Justin Stuart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Stuart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Stuart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. The following article has been included with the same AfD:

• Andrew Scites

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of JStuStudios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JStuStudios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JStuStudios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Melissa Flentzeris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melissa Flentzeris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Flentzeris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of AverageBroTV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AverageBroTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AverageBroTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of AngryPicnic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AngryPicnic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AngryPicnic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of DJ Sennett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Sennett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Sennett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of OmarGoshTV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OmarGoshTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmarGoshTV (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of JoogSquad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JoogSquad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoogSquad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Royal Stampede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Royal Stampede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Stampede until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Atlas (sports executive) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Atlas (sports executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Atlas (sports executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Danny Duncan (YouTube personality) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Duncan (YouTube personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Duncan (YouTube personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrea Wendel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Wendel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Wendel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Atlas (YouTube personality) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 02:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Royal Stampede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Royal Stampede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Stampede (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of JoogSquad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JoogSquad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoogSquad (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye75 (talk) 02:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source

Hi Mjbmr . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Ronz There is no reason to tell me that if you check my contributions, there are many users trying delete my articles, Wikipedia is waste of time anyway, I'm gonna delete your message. Mjbmr (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your choice. I just thought it would be helpful and polite to let you know. --Ronz (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Ronz Oh yeah! well you didn't see the AfD, don't you? Mjbmr (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Mandel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Mandel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Mandel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of BigDawsTv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BigDawsTv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BigDawsTv until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hobab (album), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tatum Langton. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)