User talk:Mjahangir777

The Centre
The Centre
Studio album by Sami Yusuf
Released	September 12, 2014
Recorded	Andante Records
Genre	Spiritique
Length	48:00
Label	Andante Records
Producer	Sami Yusuf
Sami Yusuf chronology

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Babak Radmanesh

Hello Mjahangir777,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Babak Radmanesh, may be copied from http://www.babakradmanesh.com/english/bio.php. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Babak Radmanesh

Hello Mjahangir777,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Babak Radmanesh for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrScorch6200 (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Babak Radmanesh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. MrScorch6200 (talk) 01:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjahangir777. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 04:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion of an album. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Without You (Sami Yusuf album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Your "references" were closely associated with the artist or could be self-edited. They are not acceptable as independent sources.
The text beginning On 'The Centre', Sami Yusuf presents an album of deeply touching, devotional music... is not taken from the source you claim. It is in fact copied from Amazon
The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. In this case, the site says © 1996-2014, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims or claims sourced only to affiliated or sales pages, but presented as fact, include: deeply touching... impressively combines... state-of-the-art... His songs are rousing, the melodies catchy and deeply moving and all of them captivate with the inherent power of spirituality... journey of spiritual discovery... rich in their multicultural influences... message of the album is perennial... bound to capture the hearts of those seeking the timeless truths and values of unity, compassion, and faithfulness in a more beautiful language—pure spam

The text infringes Amazon's copyright and cannot be legally used It is highly spammy, and there are no independent references. You have so far posted blatant advertising three times, just putting it back up again each time it is deleted. We only accept properly referenced articles with a neutral tone, and original text. Please take note of the warning above. Continued spamming will lead to a block (which cannot be avoided by changing your user name Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jimi, \

thank you for explanation. I will do another edit without any mention to any source. please have it look.

Mjahangir777 (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Jimmy can I use this part of my article only?[reply]

Mjahangir777 (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jimfbleak Jimfbleak

Draft:Sami Yusuf - The Centre Album

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Sami Yusuf - The Centre Album, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.samiyusuflive.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sami Yusuf - The Centre Album (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sami Yusuf - The Centre Album and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mjahangir777, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sami Yusuf The Centre (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aggie80 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sami Yusuf The Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 02:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi, thanks for message. Please stop creating multiple versions of the article under different names; unless the issues are addressed they will all be deleted. I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I see no claim as to how he meets the notability criteria, but in any case the references were mainly unacceptable, using his sites, YouTube, interviews with him and similar non-independent sources instead of reputable third-party sources.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact or sourced to his own pages include: ... deeply touching, devotional music... impressively... state-of-the-art... rousing... catchy and deeply moving... — and so on in the same spammy tone
The article was a copyright violation of this page. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
You appear to have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dea Jimmy, it's several times you removed my pages from wikipedia I don't know why and I never use it for personal use or advertising!

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Centre_(sami_yusuf_album) I requested a lot just added some information about tracks and album, why you think this is something for advertise?

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mjahangir777 (talk) 02:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Samiyusuf-songsoftheway.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Samiyusuf-songsoftheway.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello. I note that on Commons you assert that you are the "designer and admin of sami yusuf". Please note that, if this is true, under our Terms of Use you are required to disclose that you work for Yusuf in one of the following:

a statement on your user page,
a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or
a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.

Currently, you are not in compliance with these Terms.

You've been told before, but should also review our conflict of interest policy. Had you familiarized yourself with them, you would have never placed content like this on Wikipedia: "The inspiration that animates this work, its life and soul, is the poetry of Seyyed Hossein Nasr, for it expresses timeless Truth and a life devoted to attaining it." It is well worth your time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies. You should be advised that editing in defiance of our conflict of interest policies, including failure to follow our Terms of Use and fully disclose your employment by Yusuf, may result in your account being blocked. Please be sure you comply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Songs of the Way (Sami Yusuf album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Songs of the Way (Sami Yusuf album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of the Way (Sami Yusuf album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Samiyusuf-songsoftheway.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Samiyusuf-songsoftheway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hesham Abdul Wahab

The article Hesham Abdul Wahab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unotable singer/songwriter

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hesham Abdul Wahab

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hesham Abdul Wahab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1001 Inventions and the World of Ibn Al-Haytham (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1001 Inventions and the World of Ibn Al-Haytham (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ibnalhaytham.com/news-events/videos/shine-music-video/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1001 Inventions and the World of Ibn Al-Haytham (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1001 Inventions and the World of Ibn Al-Haytham (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ibnalhaytham.com/news-events/videos/shine-music-video/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qpalzmmzlapq (talk | contribs) 00:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sami Yusuf 2018.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sami Yusuf 2018.jpg, which you've attributed to Sami Yusuf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa talk an email sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with template mentioned above. Thanks.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sami yusuf official image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sami yusuf official image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An email sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with template mentioned above. Thanks.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:SAMI YUSUF 2018 portrait image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SAMI YUSUF 2018 portrait image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sami Yusuf. Giant Snowman 18:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sami Yusuf. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

It's patently obvious that you have tried to evade your block using the account Hesamhatami2. If you try this again, you will be blocked indefinitely! Favonian (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Your recent editing history at Sami Yusuf shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You instantly tried to resume your edit-war on this page as soon as your block ended. That's another big no-no. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Sami Yusuf. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User:HistoryofIran, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This message is being given to you as a final warning since you've engaged in edit warring and are currently blocked. Take this advice to ensure that you stop harassing users, start discussing things instead of edit warring, and ensure that your future actions show that you are here for the right reasons. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 18:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

In spite of my previous warning, you chose to evade your block repeatedly using IPs in the range 185.239.172.0/22. As promised, you are now blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mjahangir777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24722 was submitted on Apr 14, 2019 10:35:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} and Favonian

I'm still blocked and can not write anything on the TALK page. What do you advice?

Mjahangir 09:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

While blocked you can edit only your user talk page (this page). You need to make an unblock appeal here, as instructed in the block message above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to questions you have asked on talk pages, and some advice for the future

On several talk pages you have asked questions such as why you are blocked, and why your talk page messages have been removed. Here are a few comments, in the hope that they may help you better understand the relevant issues.

Obviously in the English language version of Wikipedia it is more likely to be helpful to readers, other things being equal, for references to be in English. However, that does not mean that we exclude all content for which it is not possible, or not easy, to find references in English, it simply means that we prefer English sources if they are available. As Skywatcher68 has explained to you, sources do not have to be in English.
You have repeatedly asked why you are blocked. I will try to explain to you why you are blocked, in the hope you will understand this time, even though you have already been told why you are blocked, and apparently didn't understand. Wikipedia works by editors collaborating. Very often editors disagree, as must happen in a project open to anyone to contribute to. When we disagree we discuss the issues involved, in the hope of reaching an agreement, or at least a compromise which we are all willing to accept. Unfortunately we don't always succeed in doing so, in which case consensus among most editors is accepted, even though that means that one or more editors don't get the result that they would have liked. Hundreds of times in my editing career spanning the last 13 years I have had to accept that the outcome of a discussion has been one that I disagreed with. Most editors accept that in a project created by many people with different opinions any one editor will sometimes have to accept an outcome they think is wrong. Unfortunately, however, a small minority of editors think that if they disagree with other editors then they should do the following. (1) Keep on posting what they prefer in articles over and over again, in the hope that eventually everyone else will give up, so that the most stubborn editor finishes up getting his or her way. (2) Keep on posting what they think in talk pages over and over again, ignoring anything they are told about Wikipedia policies and guidelines, because they are convinced that their opinion is RIGHT and anyone who disagrees with it is wrong. Unfortunately, we all think our opinions are right, and each one of us just insisting over and over again that he or she is right and ignoring everyone else's opinion achieves nothing apart from wasting everyone's time. Editors who follow the line I have just described create problems for other editors, and take up time that could have been better used on more constructive work for the encyclopaedia, so usual practice is to warn them that what they are doing is unacceptable, and if they still do the same then they are blocked from editing for a while, in the hope that they will get the message and start cooperating after the block is over. That is what happened to you. You were warned about edit-warring, and ignored the warning, so you were blocked for one day. You chose to ignore that, and continued to edit-war, so you were blocked again, for longer. You chose to evade the block by editing without using your account, so you were blocked indefinitely. You chose to evade that block, and continued to edit both by editing without using an account and by using other accounts. If you had made different choices you would not now be blocked.
You have been told how to request an unblock. "Just ignore the block and continue to edit using another account or not using an account" is not what you were told.
As you know, I have removed some of the content that you posted to this page while evading blocks. Wikipedia policy is that editing by blocked editors may be removed on sight. The purpose of that is to persuade blocked editors that evading blocks is not worth doing, as any editing they do while evading a block will achieve nothing. I did not in fact remove every edit that you made while blocked, but only the most recent ones, in the hope that doing so might convey to you the message that you will not get away with evading your blocks. Since you have continued to evade your block after I did that, evidently it hasn't worked. If I see you evading your block again, whether by using another account or by editing without using an account the I shall carefully go through the editing history and remove every edit which you have made, on any page, while evading one or more blocks.
I have explained at some length the reasons for your block, since you asked what the reason was. I hope that will help make it clearer to you. However, please also remember that there have been various other problems with your editing too, which you have already been told about, such as editing for promotional purposes, and editing contrary to the guidelines on conflict of interest. Even if you persuade an administrator that lifting your block for edit-warring and block evasion will lead to benefit for the encyclopaedia, you should bear in mind that those other problems, if they continue, may lead to a further block. In view of all the messages you have received over the last four years, and which have not led to any change in your practices, you might well have been blocked long ago, and now that the problems have come to the notice of administrators it is less likely that any continued infractions will be overlooked, so my advice is to be very careful if and when you are unblocked, and make sure you read take note of the relevant policies and guidelines. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One more point which I didn't think to mention when I wrote the message above. Joining two adjectives of nationality or ethnicity together, as in "Iranian-British", does not imply dual citizenship. For a very long time it has been common in American English to use expressions such as "Japanese American" and "Italian American" to refer to United States citizens whose ancestry or ethnic background is from somewhere else, without implying dual citizenship. In more recent times the same has become common in British English, except that it is for some reason more common in British usage to put the words the other way round, so that "British Iranian" would perhaps be better. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JamesBWatson,

Thank you for clarify, I will send you a longer message here responding to your text.

I would very appreciated if you can unblock me and my colleague accounts, that we can continue in the talk page and answer to your points directly or guide us a way responding to you directly by email or whatever you prefer.

Best regards,

Mjahangir 12:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Mjahangir 14:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

—

Dear JamesBWatson,

Thank you for your response and clarification.

I apologize for evading the block. I did not know about the rules and assure this will not happen again. Also, for the sake of transparency with you the below response was drafted together with my colleagues at Clover Management which manage Mr Yusuf worldwide. As English is not my first language I asked for their assistance to avoid further misunderstanding. I also would like to apologize for the length of the email.

Please see below some information that I would like to clarify.

1- For the last 16 years of Sami Yusuf’s public profile/career there has never been a mention of dual nationality. Neither on Wikipedia or Google or any other media source. He has been correctly described as British in all these years and you can see this in just very few sources I mention below:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2006/apr/27/1?INTCMP=SRCH https://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/music/sami-yusuf-to-play-one-night-only-show-in-abu-dhabi-1.848368 http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1220754,00.html https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04gnhvx https://www.wfp.org/news/news-release/sami-yusuf-dedicates-new-song-typhoon-survivors-philippines

2- It is false to call Sami Yusuf "British-Iranian" as he does not hold Iranian citizenship and never has. For the purpose of clarification he is ethnically Azeri (not Iranian). So if one wanted to insist on referring to him by his ethnicity then he would need to be described as British-Azeri. Again, Sami Yusuf only holds British Citizenship.

3- These changes only occurred recently by two users that we are suspecting to be Iranian nationalists/supremacists who have their own agendas behind making these changes.

4- Regarding your point about the nationality I refer to other examples of celebrities who have Western passports but are of different ethnic backgrounds. To give you a few examples: Sir Mo Farah (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mo_Farah), who was born in Mogadishu/ Somalia, is described as a ‘British Athlete’, The singer Dua Lipa (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dua_Lipa), who is of Albanian descent is described as an ‘English singer’ London’s mayor Sadiq Khan (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sadiq_Khan), who is of Indian/Pakistani ancestry is described as a ‘British politician’. The list is countless.

We do not understand why Sami Yusuf is suddenly treated differently? Is there something about Sami Yusuf that does not make him ‘British enough’? Honestly, it is difficult to not think of behind the scenes agendas by some of the users (it seems to be the same people). We believe that these changes are done in bad faith without interest in truth. Not acknowledging Mr Sami Yusuf as a British citizen, ‘having to add’ and emphasize an ethnic background to him (which is again- if one wanted to be truthful - not Iranian but Azeri) is simply discriminatory.

Please understand that (and I am sure you are aware) Wikipedia has become a reference for many. From media outlets to even embassy staff. We were actually made aware of this recent change on your platform by a media outlet that sent us a press release about an upcoming performance. In that press release Sami Yusuf was described as 'British-Iranian' and when we checked we were informed that this information was taken from Wikipedia. It is very difficult and time consuming for us to correct all false information.

We would sincerely appreciate if you could help us delete this false information from our artist's wikipedia page. We have also contacted our lawyers who will make sure that all false articles will be removed/rectified. However, as you can imagine, this takes a bit of time. It really is a vicious cycle where one article is removed and another one is put up that is based on false information taken from Wikipedia. It is frustrating to say the least. In the meantime we hope that you can work with us so that this false information does not get picked up by more media and spread any further.

Thank you and I look forward to hear from you.

Mjahangir 14:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Legal action

You say "We have also contacted our lawyers who will make sure that all false articles will be removed/rectified." You obviously have the right to take whatever legal action you wish, but while legal action is in progress (or the threaten of legal action exists), you are prohibited from editing Wikipedia. You will not be unblocked and nobody here will discuss Sami Yusuf with you until your legal action is concluded and/or the legal threat is withdrawn. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have upgraded the block to cover the legal threat/legal action too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Response to legal action

@Boing! said Zebedee: @JamesBWatson:

Hello there,

For transparency, the below message has been drafted with the help of Mr. Yusuf’s management as English is not my first language.

I think there has been a misunderstanding. Please let it be clear: there is NO legal threat—either implicitly or explicitly—towards Wikipedia nor anyone else. We are not intending to take “legal action” against anyone. On the contrary, Wikipedia is a public platform run by passionate volunteers! Who exactly would we be ‘threatening’ here? What I meant was that we will strive —with the help of our lawyers—to get inaccurate articles removed outside Wikipedia (eg BBC PERSIAN etc). In fact, we have already contacted several media outlets. However, to expedite the process we decided to use our lawyers as they may have a better chance of reaching key individuals /decision makers. I hope that this clarifies the matter.

As mentioned before, Wikipedia has become a huge success and serves as a ‘first point of reference’ and a major source of information for so many. Therefore, I’m sure you appreciate that having an accurate bio/page is of paramount importance.

We are grateful that someone from your organisation takes out time to respond to us and we sincerely apologise for any misunderstandings caused.

We remain hopeful that this matter will be resolved as soon as possible.

Best regards,

Madi

Mjahangir 05:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Dear @Dusti: and @JamesBWatson:

Did you check the message above. Your response would be very appreciated.

Here are a few comments.

Thank you for clarifying the legal issue. You have made it clear that you do not intend to take any legal action against anyone in connection with Wikipedia editing, so perhaps Boing! said Zebedee will be willing to remove the mention of legal threats that he added to the block log.
Luckily I came back to this page to see whether you had posted anything more since the last time I was here. If I hadn't done so it is possible that nobody would ever have seen your message, because your ping didn't work. For a ping to work it has to be posted in the same edit as a ~~~~ to sign the post. It doesn't work if you just post the ping without the ~~~~, or if you post the ping and add ~~~~ in two separate edits, or if you modify an existing ping by putting in a different name. If you still want Dusti to see your message then I suggest you ping him again, making sure that this time you do include a signature.
I have made a change to the first sentence of the article, which I hope will be a compromise which everyone can agree to accept, even if it isn't quite what anyone would ideally have liked. I have explained what I have done on the article's talk page, so I won't repeat what I said here.
You are free to make another unblock request if you wish to. If you do so, then you will need to make it clear that you understand the reasons for the block, and will not make the same mistakes again. I also think it only fair to mention that I do have some doubts about some of the things you have said, such as your statement that you don't understand Persian, and I would not personally unblock you unless that were to be cleared up, though of course another administrator might take a different view. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm happy to update the block log, and have reblocked with an appropriate comment. (On the subject of pings, I'm convinced they sometimes don't work even when they're done properly.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @JamesBWatson:,

Thank you very much for your response in helping to get this most pressing matter resolved. We truly appreciate it. Kindly see my response to your points below:

1. Thank you for removing the ‘legal action’ mention from the block log. Once again, I would like to emphasise that “legal action”--of any kind--was never considered. My sincere apologies for the misunderstanding.

2. Thank you for clarifying the ping issue. I was sure I used the ping with the signature Mjahangir 12:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC), but I guess I might have made a mistake.

3. Thank you very much for this. It’s very helpful and a reasonable compromise at this stage.

4. I will make another unblock request and assure you that I will not make the same mistakes. With regards to the misunderstanding about Persian, I would like to clarify that I myself understand Persian but Mr. Yusuf’s management (who are based in UK, USA and UAE) do not. I am part of the team that manages website and social media. Therefore, what I meant to say is that I am the only person from the ‘Sami Yusuf Team’ that understands Persian. Again, sorry for the misunderstanding.

By the way, would it be possible for “CCloverm16” (from Mr Yusuf’s management team) to also be unblocked? She honestly does not have a clue of how Wiki works and was merely following talk instructions before the christening of her first post got her blocked. However, if this is not possible we totally understand and respect Wikipedia’s rule.

Once again, thank you very much for taking out the time to attend to this issue.

Best regards,

Madi

Mjahangir 12:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)