User talk:Mittalmailbox

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Mittalmailbox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 11:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uget

Hello Mittalmailbox,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uget for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vvvaggot (talk) 05:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Chilakaluripet, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vin09. An edit that you recently made to Ponnur seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vin09 (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

The change in population ref led to cite error in Ponnur page. Do not add commas, as the infobox automatically takes the population with comma, instead provide population for outdated pages rather than present population pages.--Vin09 (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nagari, Andhra Pradesh. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 09:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sattenapalle, you may be blocked from editing. Vin09 (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Repalle. Vin09 (talk) 09:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your mistake was that your new reference was added inside the old one (leaving fragments of the old reference), instead of replacing the old one. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get you what you are referring to? What is this, scroll down to see references section.--Vin09 (talk) 10:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a different error, which occurred because the removed reference is being used in other part of the article. We have a bot that automatically fixes this error. Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Oh is it I was mistaken for a user who was intentionally removing it by seeing here and earlier profile here.

I've blocked this account. It is not allowed to run bots without authorization on this wiki. Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mittalmailbox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked for running a bot without approval. I wasn't aware of the policy but now I have read https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. I will strictly follow the policy and will make a new account and get my bot approved.

Decline reason:

Closing. No feedback to comments below. Huon (talk) 10:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Materialscientist: I don't know about you, but I would want to see good and solid evidence that this bot will never run (until it is approved by the authorisation group) before I'd be prepared to unblock. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and I won't unblock before a reasonable request from the bot owner at WP:BAG. This account does not need to edit until then. Materialscientist (talk) 21:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That creates a key-locked-in-chest scenario, then. I would argue that the reasonable request should be crafted here first as a precondition of unblock, and then once unblocked it can be cross-posted to BAG. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:06, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine, but there is no "key-locked-in-chest scenario" here - a bot needs to have an owner account, which should show up. Note that account creation is enabled on this block. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Narsipatnam page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Rohtak page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Nuzvid page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Morena page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please guide me to lift block

Hi, Can anyone guide me how to proceed to get block lifted.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mittalmailbox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mittalmailbox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mittalmailbox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Quotient Technology. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 15:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]