User talk:Mister Mystery

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Stone Cold Sober (Paloma Faith song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 13:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Do You Want the Truth or Something Beautiful? (song)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Do You Want the Truth or Something Beautiful? (song). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do You Want the Truth or Something Beautiful? (song). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 6)‎. Thank you. Nancy ^talk 10:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please not that IMDB, blogs and twitter, referenced in your recent edits to the article Doctor Who (2010 series) are not considered reliable sources. Also most rumours are not considered notable. I have therefore reverted your edits to this page [1]. Edgepedia (talk) 22:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule

Shortcut

WP:3RR

Please stop your edits. Hektor (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is about the edit conflict going on at the List of Doctor who serials page Mister Mystery is not violating 3RR. There are strict guidelines involving reliable sources being required for any edits on that page. The anon IP's are adding rumors and speculations about the titles. Titles and airing order for this series have often changed from the ones rumored while filming is going on. the anon IPs also refuse to discuss this situation on the talk page. Thus, MM is protecting the page per wikiguidelines, as are several others of us. Keep up the good work MM aand happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 15:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am a registered user and I am using DWM #418 as a source. MM behaviour will be reported. Administrators will judge. I think that being blocked for a while in order to cool down a little will do him good. Hektor (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWM is not a reliable source for this info as they have been wrong before. Admins will also look at your action and your violation of the 3RR will be taken into account. MarnetteD | Talk 16:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check your facts, I reverted twice. And why is DWM an OK source in this article for the names of the directors and writers of the episodes and not an OK source for the titles. Is User:Mister Mystery a sockpuppet of yours by the way ? Hektor (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Doctor Who (2010 series). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sandstein 21:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Radio (Laura White song). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. I42 (talk) 11:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. anemoneprojectors talk 12:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Paloma+Faith.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Paloma+Faith.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. anemoneprojectors talk 12:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]