User talk:Misantropileño

Welcome!

Hello, Misantropileño, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nikki Vianna, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikki Vianna

The article Nikki Vianna has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, im working in that article, sorry for upload in construction. Misantropileño (talk) 20:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki Vianna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Vianna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Vianna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 21:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helbiz

Constructive criticism: You really should have done something else instead of just reverting these changes. I've put in a request to protect the page from IP vandalism and placed a l4 warning on the page. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got tired of explaining to the Ukrainian that this is not the way to publish on wikipedia, if he wants to do a complaint, he needs quality links that make up a compelling story, apparently he is behind the creation of a defamatory page, the page copies real news and uses it to reference paragraphs of the content https://hbznews.com (russian page), it is a sistematic attack of hate and harassment, if it is real what he says he need to prove it but not in the way he does. Its a good idea to protect the page, ask to protect Palella too Misantropileño (talk) 00:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demetrius Watkins (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources are associated with the subject of the article. See WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST for the relevant criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demetrius Watkins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Demetrius Watkins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misantropileño! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Demetrius Watkins

Hello, Misantropileño. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Demetrius Watkins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Demetrius Watkins

Hello, Misantropileño. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Demetrius Watkins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]