User talk:Mirgheca

Welcome!

Hello, Mirgheca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Khoi khoi 00:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Borla

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Borla, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Borla, Sălaj. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alimpiu Barboloviciu

A tag has been placed on Alimpiu Barboloviciu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 12:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bădăcin

A tag has been placed on Bădăcin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Khoi khoi 02:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright policy advisement regarding articles

Dear Mirgheca, regarding your contribution to Vasile Stoica, sportiv, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from web sites or printed material without the express permission of the author or copyright holder. This article appears to be a direct copy from this URL: http://www.ici.ro/romania/vasilestoica/e_prezentare.html As a copyright violation, the article has been deleted under the speedy deletion criteria.

If you choose to recreate the article, please ensure that the material is written in your own words. If you believe that using sentences from the source is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the new article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License, or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the new article with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to <permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.

Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Câteva precizări

Îmi pare bine să văd că contribuiţi la Wikipedia dar ar trebui să semnalez trei lucruri importante. În primul rând, aici se folosesc note la subsol pentru a da suport bibliografic afirmaţiilor din articole. De pilde, vedeţi Ion Heliade Rădulescu - are 126 de note, în fiecare paragraf după introducere. În al doilea rând, nu trebuie sa cunoaşteţi perfect limba engleză, dar totuşi, nu e prea amuzant să trebuiască să vină alţii şi să interpreteze ce încercaţi să scrieţi. Dacă contribuiţi la o enciclopedie într-o anumită limbă, nu se presupune că o cunoaşteţi destul de bine? În al treilea rând, s-a cam hotărât să nu avem articole despre fiecare sat, ci să ne oprim la comune. Eventual eu am să unesc articolele despre sate scrise de dvs., dar în viitor, v-aş ruga să scrieţi despre satul B ca o secţie în articolul despre comuna A, şi nu sub forma de articol complet separat. Biruitorul ^Talk 23:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dâmbul Radului

A tag has been placed on Dâmbul Radului requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Scottydude _talk 04:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Giurtelecu Simleului 1920 Census.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Giurtelecu Simleului 1920 Census.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.