Jump to content

User talk:MiraSchuetz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Nomadicghumakkad,
thank you for your comment. I added the first author publication of Dr. Nicolas H. Thomä with the highest number of citations to the education section. Please note, that the last position in an author list shows the corresponding author, in terms of being responsible for the project. The list of references shows only a selection (relevant for the content in the wikipedia article) of his outstanding contribution to the field of his reserach. I have cited 13 publications of Dr. Nicolas H. Thomä (12 as corresponding author) including 7 publications in Nature, 2 in Science and 1 in Cell. Nature, Science and Cell are the most important journals in the field of Biochemistry (among others). I will also add a link to his full publication list.
Please let me know, if there is anything else you think is missing.
Best regards,
Mira Schuetz MiraSchuetz (talk) 09:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä (April 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MiraSchuetz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä has been accepted

[edit]
Nicolas H. Thomä, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]