User talk:Mioncraft

October 2024

Hi Mioncraft! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Before I reverted the edit I carefully did read the Edit warring page and under the exemptions the 7th point it says removing unsourced or poorly sourced content does not count as edit warring. The person that deleted my overall edit claimed that the Baburnama relates Turkmun Hazaras with Turkmeni people of the west, that is false, the source mentions them as Turkmun Hazara from Turkmun valley, thats it, not relating them like that person claimed. The most oldest and credible historian that commentates on this topic agrees with my assertion that the naming is geographic in its origin coming from the valley. The person made a few other claims that other historians/sources, presummaly more credible, first hand, and older than my source agrees with his claim that Turkmun Hazaras are Turkmeni people/Turkmeni related but failes to provide a source for that. Mioncraft (talk) 03:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss all this on the article talkpage and work it out. Acroterion (talk) 03:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]