User talk:Milsapb/Zoology

Peer Review

Hello! The inclusion of the picture of DNA is likely to be a good addition to the article. However, I am having some trouble understanding what exactly was changed from the article itself. If your "lead" section is meant to cut out the second paragraph of the articles lead than I think this would be a good change seeing as that information is spoken in more detail late on. Otherwise, I think you chose a hard article to change much on as it seems pretty strong. If planning to change anything more I would look first at the article for any potential confusing or unnecessary words or sections (although I am unable to find any I would change). After which I would look into possibly adding new information such as changing the "Branches of zoology" into two sections, one by group studied and one by nature of study (though this would be a large addition). Abrault (talk) 17:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I appreciate that you expressed some concern regarding exactly what I was changing from the article itself! I am planning on adding/breaking apart some of the sections, much like you discussed breaking the "Branches of Zoology" into two sections. I did select a rather strong article, but I figured I could enhance it by including an additional image of the structure of DNA. Thank you so much for your comments and ideas! Milsapb (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)