User talk:MilenaDobreva

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/POCOS project. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 01:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AlphaQuadrant,

Thank you for the review. I should say that I really paid attention to add external sources - amongst them a document from a recent report from a workshop at the European Commission and two articles in research journals, plus another internal report at the Vienna University of Technology as an external link which all are reliable sources. I am not quite sure what more would be helpful to add - I can easily put dozens of references but the idea is to provide a reasonable guidance to understand the topic (and in this case it is to highlight the domain to which the project presented contributes) and not to write a research paper. I also included two publicity references for the first symposium which this project organises, one is a link to an article in The Observer, the Sunday edition of The Guardian.

I would appreciate if you could provide me a guidance which is more specific on ***what*** in the article do you feel needs to be supported by sources. And is there a source which I used you would consider as not being reliable?

Many thanks for your time and help, MilenaDobreva (talk) 06:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Михал Орела 13:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Your page is now online in Wikipedia... --Михал Орела 13:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MihalOrela (talk • contribs)

Your submission at Articles for creation

{{subst:Afc talk||class=|sig=yes}

I have approved your submission! --Михал Орела 13:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MihalOrela (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of POCOS project

The article POCOS project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent reliable sources about the project. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of POCOS project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article POCOS project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POCOS project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusio (talk) 21:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]