User talk:Mikhail2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikhail2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to change my name and make positive contribution, honestly i didn't know

Decline reason:

Please describe the contributions you wish to make, and tell what was wrong with your prior contributions, this will help to demonstrate your understanding of why you were blocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikhail2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I make 1st mistake by choosing wrong commercial name, 2nd mistake is to create a page related to a company with general information, I can contribute by chooing related subject to my knowledge and will not use any commercial related to any company.

Decline reason:

This request is incoherent. Additionally, it doesn't convince me you've even bothered to read, let alone understood, WP:COI and WP:PAID and WP:PROMO. Finally, you know you won't be unblocked to promote Skyshift, so what do you plan to write about instead? Yamla (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your current block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned. Do that again and you will lose access to this talk page. You are welcome to make a new unblock request but you are not permitted to remove or edit a declined request. --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mikhail2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Mikhail2022 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was blocked without any notice period forever from 1st mistake, would you be kind to give a chance to me, i thought that the professional editors will review what i put and give feedback untill it is acceptable, i am asking for your guidance for new comers . is it resonable to block users with their IP address froever forjust giving a general information about existing company with published Application IOS and Android, please revoke the blocking or at least remove IP blocking so i can start again clean page, this mistake will not happen because now i know you are so stricted. and no second chances.

Decline reason:

See below Nosebagbear (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikhail2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason to unblock me because it's your policy to do blocking gradually , A soft account block (autoblock disabled, account creation allowed) will only block the specific account from editing. An autoblock is not applied to the IP address the account last used, and other accounts that log in from the IP address are allowed to edit as normal. This is generally used in situations such as blocking promotional usernames or to enforce other username policy violations. This allows the blocked account to register a new account with a username that is in compliance with the username policy, or simply choose to edit anonymously under the IP if they decide not to do so, please apply policy without bias

Decline reason:

Non-IP blocks like the one you mention "soft blocks" would only be appropriate if this was a username-only block. As the original notice says (you removed it, but you can find it in the view history tab) you were also blocked for promotional content. It wasn't some eternal egregious instance of such, but any unblock request is going to have to address that issue to succeed. I would specifically note that were you able to create a new account (say if your IP changed) that would be prohibited - the block is on you, not a specific account. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

STOP IT. You have an open unblock request. There's no need to add a second. And stop trying to add categories to your user talk page. If you are unwilling to address the concerns with your editing or follow basic directions, let alone policies and guidelines, we'll shut down your access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 14:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikhail2022. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]