User talk:Mikey551415

This user seeks adoption by an experienced editor.
(Users offering adoption)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikey551415 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reaching out cause I was falsely banned by a report by user BlueboyLINY Bbb23 blocked me reason disruptive editing when BlueboyLINY on WEPN-FM PAGE Which you did semi protect cause of the war between the user and i (I appreciate that help btw!) the user kept reverting the changes and has done so again. I fixed the missing citation and removed that heading BlueboyLINY reverted now they are gone again, I have tried to peacefully settle matter as advised on The talk page but user still didn’t accept that. User continues to warn my Talk page for editing and reverting what they had. To me they are know it alls and are very controlling and if they can’t have it there way they have a fit and do anything to stop the other person from being able to edit. Which has been done… (me I been blocked) I feel Blue should be blocked. They will not let others edit other radio stations Wikipedia’s he keeps reverting them too. It’s like he wants full control over all the radio stations such as WEPN FM WKTU WNEW AND Z100. This is not fair to other Wikipedia users, he has left wiki in past due to others always editing and stated when he removed it “I don’t need this shit” this is unacceptable can you help at all? top it off Blueboy has reverted the Page WEPN-FM back to the way he had it.. this is really getting out of hand and he removed the warnings I gave him and all… Daniel semi protected page due to this I requested it im tired of fighting and Blue reported me and gave me warnings for whatever reasons and got me blocked too.. this is ridiculous! to also prove my point about this case please see his former profile as well: User:BlueboyLI And I quote “ I took a break from editing tv pages for about 6 months due to stubborn Wikipedia editors who don't seem to get what Wikipedia is, a collaboration. I'm back now in an effort to make Wikipedia better by adding information that I know to be factual.” -BlueboyLI @BlueboyLINY…. The funny thing is I have attempted to resolve matter peacefully on WEPN-FM talk page and was unsuccessful. Blue continued to keep reverting the page. It got very annoying. I requested a semi protective of page and got it.. Blue got me blocked and yet again reverted the page to where they wanted it.. Like this is Wikipedia we all should be able to edit things freely without this nonetheless. I am the victim here. I also feel like I am the target to Blue and I honestly have no idea as to why. Nick B (talk) 04:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only your actions are relevant here, not those of other editors. Nothing here addresses your violations of WP:EW, nor your violations of WP:NPA. If you make a new unblock request, you need to talk only about your own actions. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mikey, you are disrupting this page. I removed the auto-block section you added. Stop signing as "Nick B". It's very close to the username of an administrator, and it's grossly misleading to editors looking at this page. If you continue in this manner, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature is Nick B for following

@Bbb23 my signature is Nick B as that’s my real name. I don’t use my full last name on wiki you can’t tell me to stop signing as “Nick B” as it’s my real name Nick B (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that when your block expires, you request that your username be changed to "Nick B".--Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It will let me do that now I can look if you would like. Also can you send me source to do so Nick B (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikey551415 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly I would like to address the Editing warning myself and another member were not in agreement in a wiki page. I have attempted several times to resolve matter by using the pages Talk page. Please see this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WEPN-FM

However results didn’t go as expected. I requested semi protection of the page which was approved. I fixed page again to where it was suppose to be. Other User kept reverting it back to the way they wanted it. I had to fix it and keep re adding the missing citations too. User kept reverting it stills also started spamming my page with warnings. I was adviced by a Wiki administrator to warn them on there talk page which I did.

The user kept removing them.

I feel like the editing war could of been avoided if instead user used talk page on the section that I had to discuss matter more instead of reverting it non stop and making me having to go back and fix it too many times.. I feel personally attacked by the user.

For the personal attack issue: I did read over it. I feel like I did not violate those rules or standards. And if I did it was a mistake and I am sorry for that mistake. As much as I may disagree. I believe Wikipedia should be able to used by everyone and as long as we don’t have to have fights about a page I don’t see why we can’t have good time here. I do feel like the other user as well should be spoken too as I should have to feel when editing any radio station Wikipedia page that they will revert it to the way they had cause they disagree with it when there is a talk page and a section added that i added to discuss the matter but instead of the communication user just kept reverting which made me frustrated Project space I don’t think I violated if I did I apologize.

Editing Archives yes I do admit to do that on WEPN-FM page thus because in the archive of my edit the missing citations were there and it was easier doing it that way then having to re add them non stop.

The disruptive editing If I did violate I apologize I followed what admins advice was given which was report user which I did do and warned them and did the talk page on WEPN FM like advised. However, I don’t think I’m only one who violated this during this situation and if an admin can Email me a Guide on reporting user if I ever had to that be great the templates do confuse me and I had hard time filling them out or using correct usage command. So that’s my fault there. And I apologize will make sure not to do it again

In conclusion,

I was not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when my actions are harmful. I know this is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. I am Just trying to help the project, not hurt it. I know that otherwise, a project like Wikipedia would have been doomed from the beginning.

If unblock request is approved I will react appropriately and do what’s best for Wikipedia community and it’s guidelines. I will request admin if we can’t come to resolution on matters too.

Decline reason:

One last chance. Make your next request about yourself and your actions, not anyone else's. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nick B (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 Nick B (talk) 17:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Nick B (talk) 17:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry to see you ignored my warning and the approach suggested by WP:GAB to talk only about your actions, not those of other editors. Note that it's very possible (though unlikely) that your block may be extended as a result. --Yamla (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I understand, what warnings did you give me? Nick B (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon please see below topic when you have a chance! 😁 Nick B (talk) 01:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NEW at 21:31 09/07/2024 Unblock Request

@Bbb23@Ponyo

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikey551415 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Evening, Thank you for taking the time to read this over.

Firstly, I would like to address the Editing warning, I didn't feel like I was doing anything wrong but to help the Wikipedia community on a page. However, the edits kept getting removed which caused me to revert them, as I had citations that were missing since "2012" on the page and they kept getting removed. So I reverted each time someone changed it because it was becoming a pain to find the site again and put it in citations again. I found that just reverting it made it easier. If I did go into an editing war and or break the editing rules/policy then I apologize as it was not my intention. I intended to add missing information and update the page so that is accurate yes I quoted the new stuff and added a talk page topic on the wiki page about what I did and in case anyone disagreed they could write on it and it can be discussed.

I did get very frustrated that that attempt didn't work so I requested a semi-protection of the page which was approved. I fixed the page again to where it was supposed to be. However, still users kept reverting it back and not talking on the talk page of the page, to talk about the issues, so that frustrated me more so I continued to Revert the edits and added a summary for the edits made.

At the time I didn't think that I was breaking any of Wikipedia rules but I now realize I did enter a Wiki editing war and instead of seeking help from an administrator I just kept reverting which I can see could cause some disruptions. I am sorry for those actions as I didn't mean to do any of this and this wasn't my intention at all. I don't ever want to make others feel like I am vandalizing Wikipedia or anything like that. I want to help make Wikipedia a better place to edit pages and add information accordingly. In the future, I will watch myself and make sure this doesn't happen again.

The personal attack, I don't believe I attacked anyone or any pages. I did look over the Wikipedia Policies and looked over the personal attack one several times. I still don't think I violated this rule. If I did I am sorry and will not do that again.

In conclusion,

I was not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when my actions were harmful. I know this is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. I am Just trying to help the project, not hurt it. I know that otherwise, a project like Wikipedia would have been doomed from the beginning.

None of the things I was warned about were not my intentions at all. I was just trying to edit a page and make edits as I saw fit for them and fix things that were missing such as Citations, Grammar mistakes, Things that needed to be updated, etc. I never meant to break any rules at all. I'm just trying to help the projects and Wikipedia. I am also trying to make the pages as accurate as possible. I will watch my actions going forward and will make sure I am not breaking any rules if I need clarification on taking appropriate actions on a situation on a page to make sure I am not entering an Editing war I will look over the policy and ask an administrator to look it all over so I can avoid this kind of things in the near feature. I am sorry again for my actions and I will make sure they never happen again as I want to help make a difference at Wikipedia and make sure it's a safe and enjoyable place for all.

Note on signature: Please note My Signature reads "Nick B" This is my real name. I did put in a request to have my username changed to this or something available. thank you.

I thank the Administrators for their time in reading this. I do hope I can be forgiven for my actions as this was my first offense and I didn't mean to do any of the things that I did. None of it was my intention at all.

Decline reason:

I have read your appeal, and on its own could lean towards unblocking if not considering the other factors such as the things you did after writing this appeal. You've excessively pinged admins, and even sent an abusive email to Bbb23. Please take some time to review your actions knowing that admins are also human volunteer on this project. If you wish to return to Wikipedia, I'd encourage you to take a break from trying to appeal, and have enough distance to it in your next. You'd want to address spamming admins and sending abuse emails in your next appeals too. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Still awaiting unblock request to be looked at

@Jpgordon @Bbb23@Ponyo Still waiting for the unblock request above to be looked at… Nick B (talk) 18:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop being rude. Your request is in the queue. You wasted two unblock requests and there aren't many remaining reviewers. Wait your turn. If your request is not sufficiently convincing for any of the remaining reviewers to take action, that's on you. --Yamla (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How am I being rude? I was just stating that I’m awaiting an unblock request to be reviewed above. I don’t see anything rude about that Nick B (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like you’re being rude and Nasty and I don’t appreciate that Nick B (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tempted to increase your block to indefinite as you clearly haven't lost your attitude or your incompetence. However, for the moment, I've only revoked your Talk page access. But be warned: if this kind of behavior continues after your block expires, you risk being blocked indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bbb23 (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the abusive e-mail you sent me, I've increased your block to indefinite, keeping TPA revoked, and disabling e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please show evidence to where abuse occurred in the email. Cause I was not abusive in that email. I stated that I request a third party to look at my request of the block as it’s my right and not giving such right is a violation of Wikipedia policy.

and all I said to you was to stay off my talk page and to leave me alone as I feel threatened and I feel like your making me a target of yours for whatever reason and that I feel that your abusing your powers and going above your head (a power trip)

nothing about that sentence is abusive @Bbb23@Mikey551415@CoffeeCrumbs@Deepfriedokra 2600:1002:B169:5A48:798E:64EA:4CD9:12D5 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sad you don't recognize when you are being abusive. I suppose someone will block the IP for block evasion. No idea why you pinged me. I've no interest in unblocking you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE THIS ACCOUNT

@0xDEADBEEF~enwiki please delete this account 173.68.149.67 (talk) 03:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDEADCODE 173.68.149.67 (talk) 03:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadbeef 173.68.149.67 (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 173.68.149.67 (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts are not deleted. In any case, being abusive is a poor strategy to get what you want. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy blanking the user talk page is the best I have to offer. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I'm surprised, there's no basis in policy for WP:CBLANK, and per WP:BLANK, declined unblock requests of blocked users should not be removed from any Talk page. Finally, we should not be rewarding the user evading their block and the revocation of access to this page with anything.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's acourtesy, and thus not mandatory. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what that means.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with Bbb23 on this. JBW (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes can we do that please. Also since when is a block user blocked from using their own talk page? 2600:1002:B169:5A48:798E:64EA:4CD9:12D5 (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not even being abusive. I really would like to see proof of what they are referring as to abusive. Cause I’m legit not I’m just talking normally and right now it’s like any little thing I do is an attack to them and not understanding why 2600:1002:B169:5A48:798E:64EA:4CD9:12D5 (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]