User talk:Mikeslackenerny

My talk page

Wassup?

Wassup Rishi?? Hows IIT - B? Must be over now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruzbehraja (talk • contribs) 07:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gardhab.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gardhab.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Seema Mustafa

A tag has been placed on Seema Mustafa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pekaje 10:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seemamustafa.JPG

Hi, you had earlier used {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat}} for Image:Seemamustafa.JPG. The image is not Copyrighted free use -- free use means you can use the image for commercial purposes, and have derivatives. So, I removed CopyrightedFreeUse template. The image might classify as fair use, though. utcursch | talk 12:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

teesta

I noticed the "contributions" as well. Your work is sourced and true, his is not.Baka man 03:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post-war developments

Can I request you to perhaps complete the planned section before adding it? Also it must be attributed to Marxists. Please see WP:Citing sources to see more information. And also use <ref></ref> tags. Traing 07:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your edits and sources arev very good, thankyou. However, I believe the current Immediate Post-War Developments section would do better in the short 3 paragraph ceasefire section. Regards. Traing 07:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

official Indian history. You can source from this by using <ref name="officialhistory"/> Traing 07:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your brilliant additions. I have compressed them and moved your exact wordings to 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish. Traing 07:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 10:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Setalvad

Sorry, you're quite right. I didnt even see the interview was with Javed; I just thought "blast, someone's added Varsha's accusations" and deleted it per WP:BLP. Thanks for catching that. Hornplease 09:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, if you want to start an article on the Pak-India Ppls Forum I would be willing to help out... an assumption made on the basis of your recent edits to D'Souza's bio. Hornplease 09:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Career break part in the VB article may have been authentic, but WP:BLP, the wikipedia policy governing bio articles, does not permit linking to or sourcing from blog posts or newsgroups.

About AID, WP:RS requires that we find a reliable source saying "AID has worked against IDRF"; the reason being that if no reliable source - a mjor paper, or peer-reviewed work of scholarship, or book, has written about it, then it isnt notable enough to be in the article. IN particular, merely looking at stopfundinghate.com and inferring details from there might be original research. In any case, placing it under 'criticism' might be questioned.Hornplease 04:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-Indian War

Apologies for the late reply. I was overwhelmed with work for much of the past week and didn't have a chance to check Wikipedia until the weekend. Thanks for posting the links to the wiki talk page and to my own. I'll try to take a look at all of them in my free time. --Yuje 02:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I didn't notice that you added in stuff about casualties. I took a glance through the diffs, and there were several pages of deleted material, so I probably didn't notice your additions in the mess of things. Please add it back again. I appreciate your efforts in helping us find more sources on various aspects of the article. Please don't take my accidental deletion as my objection to it or a deliberate revert. --Yuje 06:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Setalvad

Please read WP:BLP and WP:NOR. On WP you must restrict yourself to strictly what you can find on reliable sources, not the 'obvious inferences' one could draw. Please note that I have retained your HT link, and indicated that that link groups her in with several individuals as 'pro-left'. About your comments on my talkpage, a cardinal virtue on wikipedia is to assume good faith, so I trust you will attempt to avoid accusations of slant in the future. Hornplease 08:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 09:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PiledHigherDepper-Slackenerney.PNG

Hello Mikeslackenerny, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PiledHigherDepper-Slackenerney.PNG) was found at the following location: User:Mikeslackenerny. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gardhab.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gardhab.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seemamustafa.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Seemamustafa.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 17:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JohnDolan.jpg

I have tagged Image:JohnDolan.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 22:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you took this picture you can release it into the public domain. If not, do you know who took it? Dsol 14:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Setalvad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Setalvad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TargetCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TargetCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mjakbar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mjakbar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Varsha.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Varsha.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rajdeep Sardesai 2008.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rajdeep Sardesai 2008.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M. J. Akbar

Thanks for your note on my talk page, the reason I moved M. J. Akbar to Mubashar Jawed Akbar is because that's how the article introduces him. Feel free to move it back - but if you do, you should also note in the lead that "M. J. Akbar" is how he is commonly known. Regards Pahari Sahib 16:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Joseph Stein (Architect)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Joseph Stein (Architect), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Joseph Stein (Architect) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Joseph Stein (Architect), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Det-Mooch.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Det-Mooch.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 02:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Gardhabmykill.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gardhabmykill.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 02:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:IIMK Postcard 2008.jpg

File:IIMK Postcard 2008.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:IIMK Postcard 2008.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:IIMK Postcard 2008.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gentlemancover.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gentlemancover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Katherine Liddy

I have nominated Katherine Liddy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Liddy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pgallert (talk) 10:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Gardhab.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gardhab.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Mikeslackenerny,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Seemamustafa.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Seemamustafa.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mikeslackenerny. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Target(magazine) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Target(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the Target(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Katherine Liddy.jpg

The file File:Katherine Liddy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katherine Liddy.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katherine Liddy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Joseph Allen Stein 1986.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Allen Stein 1986.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]