User talk:Mikepals

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Navayne, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Altered Walter (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm KingAndGod. I noticed that in this edit to Kevin Navayne, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KingAndGod 12:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Kevin Navayne

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Kevin Navayne, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Navayne

Hello, if you want the article Kevin Navayne deleted, please see WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I made Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Navayne using your PROD rationale. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Counterpart Advisors

The article Counterpart Advisors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 22:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Counterpart Advisors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Counterpart Advisors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 00:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]