User talk:Mikeingrassia

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Zendik Farm. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Versageek 09:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV on Zendik Farm

While it's clear that you have very strong opinions on Zendik Farm, I need to remind you that all edits on Wikipedia must follow the neutral point of view policy. If you continue reverting back to your preferred version, then I will block you. - Jredmond 16:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply not an oppinion. I'm in the process of learning how to site my sources better, this is too dangerous to leave uncontested.

I'm just getting into this wikipedia game, hopefully I can get my sources up to par before too long.

I recomend you look into the page leadership, and their lack of nutrality concerning what even the government recognizes as a cult.

You'd better start citing soon - unsourced allegations are not acceptable, and get removed quickly.

As for your "it is not an opinion" statement: you may want to read the neutral point of view policy before adding further "cult" allegations.

Finally: I need to remind you that committing more than three reversions over the course of one day is grounds for a block. See three-revert rule for further details. - Jredmond 20:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I truely am working on it, this is not a single purpose account.

Your contributions say otherwise. - Jredmond 19:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to remind you that if this website had existed in the 70's or 90's and it had allowed biased individuals related to the organizations serve as moderators, the branch davidians and the jonestown cult would have both sounded like perfectly lovely places.

You'll note that the article is currently wavering between a very short, rather neutral description (located in X, follow Zendik's philosophy) and your longer, completely unsourced damnation (it's a cult and they're all under investigation).

All accusations aside, you still haven't provided sources for a single thing you've posted, even when prompted; you're edit warring with other users; and your style and tone are identical to a blocked user, which leads me to suspect you're a sock puppet (though checkuser will have to verify that).

For the last time: read WP:NPOV and be sure that all your content follows it to the letter. - Jredmond 19:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Talmon6 (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]