User talk:Mikedonald711

Welcome!

Hello, Mikedonald711, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 01:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Betty White, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C759 (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Towers

Mike: thanks for your contributions here, but you must use correct capitalization, spacing and punctuation. This is an encyclopedia article, not a blog. You can expect that incorrectly formatted edits will be reverted. Ground Zero | t 11:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome Mikedonald711 (talk) 05:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to CTV Television Network, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 08:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Johnny Au. Your recent edit to the page Target Canada appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A chain is not defunct until the last store is closed. The same applies to Zellers. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 15:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick Route 16

Hello Mike Thank you for your recent edit to this article, however when you changed the article from miles to kilometres, it destroyed the template as it was written in american english. If your claim is true, please edit the article again but leaving the miles as they are. It should translate to kilometres automatically. Thanks.11:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

It is true Mikedonald711 (talk) 23:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in CTV Atlantic, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced trivia

Hi there, when adding content to the articles of living people, like you did on Steve Murphy (Canadian news anchor) the content must be sourced to reliable sources per WP:BLP. Doesn't matter if it's positive or negative, either way sources are needed. Because we need reliable sources, we can't use ourselves as sources. Leaving an edit summary saying you heard the subject say something isn't an appropriate source. Also, adding random pieces of trivia which is basically what the edit was doing isn't always the best type of content to be adding. What encyclopedic value does mentioning the subject saw Mary Poppins before he was 4 years old, and The Sound of Music at the same age actually add to the article? However, if you still insist on adding this type of content, can you please provide a reliable source when editing. Cmr08 (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

Hi Mike, I wanted to let you know why I reverted the infobox changes you made to Geoff Regan, and Kelly Regan articles. Only parameters that go with the particular infobox will work and appear in the article. The parameters you added were not appearing in the article, likely meaning that the parameters you added don't exist for that infobox. The birth name parameter you added to Kelly Regan was also not working, but I fixed it so it's now appearing in the article. It just needed an underscore between birth_name. The best thing to do when making changes like these is just preview the edit before you save, that way you will know if it's appearing before trying to add it.

If you need help with something or have any questions while editing, I don't mind helping. Just leave a message on my talk page. Cmr08 (talk) 08:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to CBHT-DT. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. CBHT never had a CBS affiliation, not even a secondary one Creativity-II (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop repeatedly adding unsourced personal information to articles like you did on the Kelly Regan article. If you don't understand Wikipedia policy about this then please re-read WP:BLP. The policy clearly states, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing." Cmr08 (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mikedonald711, I just found an article that backs up some of the personal info you added. "Equal Voice" website has a copy of an article that HalifaxNewsNet published in November 2009. It mentions being widowed, and when she was remarried, as well as the adoption. However, it doesn't mention first husbands name, so that still can't be added without a published reliable source. Because the subject is a living person, any personal info added must be sourced, otherwise it will end up being removed. So, if you want it to stay, please include the citation. I also tried to see if I could find a copy on Internet Archive to have a copy of the article as it appeared on that website, but no luck there. If you need to help with any of this or have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. I don't mind helping. Cmr08 (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, you're still adding personal information about living people without providing sources, like you did in Kelly Regan's article again. You have been told this already, we have to follow WP:BLP. Just because you know that personal information is correct doesn't matter, it still needs to be sourced, while trivia details should be avoided all-together. I went through the article a few weeks ago, added content, cleaned up a bit and provided sources because only a small amount of text was sourced. I was able to find a link that verified some of the content you added in the past, so is it too much to ask that you make an effort to source content you add? If you don't know how to add sources, then give me the info and I will try to do it for you. I really don't mind helping you. Cmr08 (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CJON-DT may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of programs broadcast by CBC Television. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 02:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Charlie Brown and Snoopy Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBAT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Boston–Halifax relations has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Cmr08 (talk) 00:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 NHL Winter Classic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2017 NHL Winter Classic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CJNI-DT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBYT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yvonne Colbert

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yvonne Colbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Wiae. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom Brady, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wiae /tlk 01:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More incorrect changes

Can you please stop making incorrect and unsourced changes. This is a number of times now that you have changed facts in articles claiming the content to be wrong when it wasn't. If you think something is wrong, it's ok to fix it, but provide a source to back it up, but your edit to Canadian Broadcasting Corporation claiming CBC has an agreement to keep Hockey Night in Canada until 2026 is not even close to being correct. It's Rogers that has an agreement for NHL rights until 2026. Rogers has an agreement with CBC to keep airing Hockey Night in Canada on CBC for four years.[1] Cmr08 (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in CBAT-DT. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your submissions to this article from November are too hard to understand as you wrote them and they need to be redone. Creativity-II (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at CBAT-DT, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. CBAT never had a CTV affiliation, not even when the station was still called CHSJ. Creativity-II (talk) 11:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CJNI-DT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJNI-DT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJNI-DT until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Creativity-II (talk) 08:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It’s for the city tv station in Halifax Mikedonald711 (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to CTV Atlantic. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Creativity-II (talk) 03:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at CBAT-DT. Creativity-II (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable lists

Your recent edit to CIVT-DT appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Creativity-II (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per the above: multiple editors have repeatedly asked you to stop adding unsourced or simply incorrect material to Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia operates via a collaborative editing environment, but a read through your editing history shows that you a) ignore any requests from others and b) continue to add unsourced, and sometimes hoax, material to Wikipedia pages. The majority of your edits have had to be reverted because they breach the requirements for notability or verifiability.

Bluntly, if you continue to add unsourced or hoax material to articles, you may be blocked from editing. Instead, please do consider the above policies, and work with your fellow editors to deliver relevant and sourced material in articles. -- Euryalus (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Regan

You have been told repeatedly that personal information can not be added about living people without providing a reliable source, yet you have refused to do this and continue to refuse as it evident by the last two edits you made to the Nancy Regan article.[2] and [3]. You were given a final blunt warning on your talk page after another editor took you to ANI, but have not even tried to change. I think it's clear that I and others have wasted too much time trying to explain WP:BLP to you over the last year, and a some sort of block is probably well over due. Cmr08 (talk) 03:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by CBC Television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Enough already with the unsourced claims for which you have no proof. Creativity-II (talk) 07:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of programs broadcast by CBC Television. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Creativity-II (talk) 00:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CBAT-DT. Creativity-II (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 13:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Downie

Gordon Downie has been diagnosed with cancer; as of today, he has not died of it, and in fact is still planning to embark on a concert tour with the band this summer. Please stop adding a death date to his article. Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I was predicting the future and he did die Mikedonald711 (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CBAT-DT. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Have you not learned anything from your week-long block for adding unsourced info and hoax edits? Creativity-II (talk) 03:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to CTV Two Atlantic. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Creativity-II (talk) 03:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at CBAT-DT. Creativity-II (talk) 04:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by CTV and CTV Two. 71.237.141.40 (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikedonald711, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Creativity-II (talk) 03:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikedonald711, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Creativity-II (talk) 06:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued with your long-term persistent disruptive editing, have repeatedly evaded blocks, and have continually edit-warred. (On at least one article you have continued the same edit war for over six months: there may be or may not be others where that applies, as I have not checked all of the articles you have edited.) The block on this account has therefore been made indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mikedonald711. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikedonald711, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]