User talk:Mikec755

Welcome!

Hello, Mikec755, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Fictitious" configuration space

Please take a look at the discussion I've started about this De Broglie issue. It doesn't matter if De Broglie called it fictitious, we can't make that statement on the wiki page as it's not neutral POV. Porphyro (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quora

I was reviewing De Broglie's Double Solution Theory as a new page patroller, and tested the article with Earwig's copyvio tool and got this result. The date of the Quora post was November 17th, which was unhelpful. Most of the other posts included 2015 or 2016 in their dates, so it seemed reasonable to think the Quora post preceded the Wikipedia article. I have now looked further at how you built up the article over time and agree that yours is the original version. Charles Rogers should not have copied it without attribution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Mpc755 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikec755 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

de Broglie's double solution theory is a very important theory in quantum mechanics and should have a page dedicated to it. Please restore the page. Mikec755 (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikec755 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was originally blocked. As you can tell by my posts under this account all I am trying to do is find a place for de Broglie's double solution theory to exist in Wikipedia. Can you restore the page "de Broglie's double solution theory" and the pages that had subsections that referred to it and only allow me access to them? As you can tell by my history I have not ventured away from de Broglie's double solution theory. I have not posted anywhere on Wikipedia unless someone makes a change to the de Broglie's double solution theory page or to a subsection that refers to it. I believe de Broglie's double solution theory is the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics and deserves a place on Wikipedia. That is all I am trying to accomplish. If I post anywhere else then ban me.Mikec755 (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Literally none of this addresses the reason you were blocked, and so I have serious doubts that you do in fact understand the reason. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked because you are the same user as Mpc755 (talk · contribs). You still haven't addressed that in your unblock request. In any case, you are not eligible for unblock consideration until that block is lifted. As such, I'm revoking your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]