User talk:Mikeblew

Welcome!

Hello, Mikeblew, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

That having been said, I would also like to ask you to fill in the edit summary a little more often. That's the text box that looks like this:

Thanks! Phaunt 14:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Northern Rock

I have removed your additions to the 'See also' section, as their is no explanation of why they are so important to NR. TubularWorld (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bayerisches Staatswappen 1835.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bayerisches Staatswappen 1835.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti.

Hi there, quick heads up: I moved Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti. to Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti per naming conventions. Thanks for the translation, by the way, and cheers =) --slakr^\ talk / 00:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Muelheimmosel.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Muelheimmosel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bayerisches Staatswappen 1835.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bayerisches Staatswappen 1835.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:Bartels.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bartels.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? O sama K 18:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sensors Group (DCMT)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sensors Group (DCMT), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable university group

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clutter

Would you like to consider incorporating EREPS and AREPS manuals as refs into the Clutter page? The AREPS manual is particularly useful for sea clutter modelling. 212.188.108.159 (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

W.L.Patterson, C.P.Hattan, G.E.Lindem, R.A.Paulus, H.V.Hitney, K.D.Anderson, A.E.Barrios. Technical Document 2648. Engineer's Refractive Effects Prediction System (EREPS) Version 3.0. May 1994. San Diego, CA.

Amalia E. Barrios, W. L. Patterson. AREPS User Manual V.3.6. December 2006. San Diego, CA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.188.108.159 (talk) 11:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MonopulseBridge.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:MonopulseBridge.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Bartels.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Bartels.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]