User talk:Mike maroon

April 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Olivier Martinez has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Olivier Martinez was changed by Mike maroon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913215 on 2014-04-27T09:12:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Nicole Richie with this edit. Thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Olivier Martinez. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike maroon, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mike maroon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Indigo children. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Grayfell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Indigo children, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Indigo children shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mike_maroon. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Indigo children. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]