User talk:Mike dichen

Babilona moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Babilona, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Babilona concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Babilona, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ya u can move it in to artical space

Mike dichen (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Babilona

Hello, Mike dichen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Babilona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Babilona

The article Babilona has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Writing an artical

How can i write a artival Mike dichen (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm ThirdDolphin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shakeela— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ThirdDolphin (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shakeela. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shakeela was changed by Mike dichen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951678 on 2018-04-15T03:16:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Alphonsa.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Alphonsa.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Shakeela.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Shakeela.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Babu gogineni.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Babu gogineni.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reshma(mallu actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reshma(mallu actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Reshma(mallu actress). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mumaith Khan.JPG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Mumaith Khan.JPG, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://actressalbum.com/mumaith-khan-bikini-photos-collection/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
The image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://actressalbum.com/mumaith-khan-bikini-photos-collection/. (See section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thanks, ZI Jony (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AarthiAgarwal.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AarthiAgarwal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike dichen

Hello Mike dichen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mike dichen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Shellwood (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actress Sujatha.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Actress Sujatha.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your uploads

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shakeela, you may be blocked from editing. Septrillion (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike dichen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will never edit in wiki againMike dichen (talk) 14:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Then you don't need to be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike dichen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have submited the articals by providing references from very popular news sites and i am new to the image upload area so i have no idea about uploading them in aright way so i am very sorry for that and ill never do that again without the help of admin Thank youMike dichen (talk) 03:09, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please address the following questions in your next unblock appeal:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike dichen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have answered the questions asked by the user Yunshui Here are my answers 1.legal right, given to the owner.and it should not be used without the permision of owner. 2.it is freely licenced to take info from it. 3.copyright content is not allowed in wiki because its comes under illegal action without the permision of the owner 4.we can use copyright content by seeking the permission of the owner. 5.ill check twice weather it is a copy right content and refer admin weather i should upload it or not.and ill report copyright contents uploaded by others Thank you Yunshui Mike dichen (talk) 13:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These answers are not correct. In particular, 3 and 4 are definitely wrong, and 5 will be incredibly disruptive given that some of that copyrighted material would be okay. Yamla (talk) 22:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yunshui

Can u plz riview this

I concur entirely with Yamla's assessment. Given the nature of this unblock appeal, your comments on this page, and your other contributions, it is abundantly clear that you currently lack the competence to edit Wikipedia. I have therefore removed your access to this talkpage to prevent any further spurious unblock requests. My advice to you would be to wait for a minimum of six months, after which you may be able to appeal by using the unblock ticketing system to ask for clemency under the Standard Offer. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will i get paid money for editing on wiki

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can i earn mony by editing in wikipedia admin plz help me Mike dichen (talk) 03:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing is allowed, with disclosure. Gryllida (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creat an artical

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can u please help me to create page admin ill provide u cititations help me please Mike dichen (talk) 03:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to start with a list of sources at Special:MyPage/sandbox, when you are not blocked. --Gryllida (talk) 04:34, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ya i have done dat in sand box but they are not accepting it even if i produced references

Did you review the reasons given for rejection? Do you have any questions about them? Largoplazo (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

{{unblock-auto|...}} Mike dichen (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ill edit if if i get paid

{{connected contributor (paid)}} Mike dichen (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia editors are usually volunteers. We are not paid by the Foundation or Wikipedia. Sometimes people outside the project pay editors to write about subjects of interest to them.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]