User talk:Mike2Matthews17

This is the new account from the original Mike Matthews17 account who had forgotten the password to log back in. This time I will remember it.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Does anyone know how to make this autoconfirmed instantly as the one above is 4+ days old and 10+ edits. Mike2Matthews17 (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Password

Please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Technical#How do I recover a password I have forgotten?. Giant Snowman 11:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is I did not use an email with it so that's a dead end. Mike2Matthews17 (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Hart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 12:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously. Struway2 (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eh no, the pages were not moved maliciously you coward. Kepa Arrizabalaga is the manager of Chelsea and Matthew Lowton had changed his name so I correctly moved those pages. Cheers, Mike2Matthews17 (talk) 11:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and @Matthew hk: you are on my list for demanding me to stop editing. I have ignored you because I never read those messages, you pillock. Mike2Matthews17 (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike2Matthews17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Revive me you cowards. I have made very good edits in the past and will continue to do so. And Edgar181 has been blocked so I should not have. Mike2Matthews17 (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 11:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.