User talk:Mikakeaulii
Welcome!
Hello, Mikakeaulii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status of File:Red shirt.jpg
[edit]Greetings! Can you explain how the file you uploaded, File:Red shirt.jpg, is licensed under Creative Commons? I see a copyright notice on the website http://www.garyhooser.com/ but no evidence of a Creative Commons license. —C.Fred (talk) 21:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- You've now uploaded two versions of this file. Please reply on this talk page, explaining how you hold copyright to these images, lest they be tagged for speedy deletion for copyright infringement. —C.Fred (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Red shirt.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Red shirt.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://honoluluweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/qna-gary-hooser.jpg on http://honoluluweekly.com/feature/2010/07/gary-being-gary/. As a copyright violation, File:Red shirt.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Red shirt.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Red shirt.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Red shirt.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Red shirt.jpg.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Red shirt.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- I also nominated the duplicate File:Red-shirt wikipedia.jpg for the same reason. Hekerui (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- If you hold the rights over the image and the ability (and willingness) to donate it to Wikipedia, you'll need to send an email verifying your intent. Please see the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online. Do bear in mind that uploading it to Wikipedia grants free, unrestricted use of the image, so long as you are attributed as the creator in any derivative uses (including commercial uses). —C.Fred (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]In regard to the photo mentioned above, you indicated on my talk page that "We are the agency that took his photo." Accordingly, the following applies to you, since you are an agent working for Gary Hooser and/or his campaign committee:
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gary Hooser, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)