User talk:Miguelemejia

Archives

Archive 1 –2006- 2013

DYK for Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain

On 3 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain was found playing sexual games with two women while blindfolded? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice job for expanding Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain and promoting it on DYK. I confess that it was the funny and unusual hook that made me click the article haha! Happy new year. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 08:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia

Hello! Your submission of Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RHM22 (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia

On 10 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia married the former mistress of two of his cousins? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 00:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Miguelemejia! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich

Hello! Your submission of Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dahn (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miguelemejia, more issues need to be fixed. Please stop by the nomination page as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miguelemejia, it has been three weeks since you said you'd do the required quid pro quo review for your DYK submission, but you haven't started yet, so far as I can tell. You will need to do so soon if you wish this nomination to be approved. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter, and best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helen, Princess Nicholas of Greece

Hi! I am Konstantinos, from the French Wikipedia. I just read your article about Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich of Russia and I found it great! I am presently working on Vladimir's daughter, Princes Nicholas of Greece and I thought perahps you could help me. I don't know If you read French but I already wrote this. So I was wondering if you have some material to improve what I aleady wrote about Elena's youth (for example). If it is the case, and if you are interested in my work, please contact me on my French page... PS- If you speak Spanish, it would be easier for me to use this language. Regards, Konstantinos (talk) 17:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, muchisimas gracias por tu respuesta. Me honra que te guste mi trabajo, porque yo difruté mucho leer el tuyo. Prefiero intercambiar en castellano: como buen francés, leo bastante bien el inglés, pero lo hablo de manera pésima, y me cuesta un poquitin escribirlo. El español es muchisimo mas facil para mi, aunque me enredo con los acentos!!!

Si conoces bien al personaje de Helen, me gustaria que me digas si te parece que mi trabajo es completo o no. Por ejemplo, si ves un punto importante de su historia que no he tratado, me gustaria que me lo digas. Pero esto solo sera posible cuando yo haya terminado. Ademas, me gustaria que me digas si consegui captar bien la personalidad de Helen. En efecto, mis documentos solo tratan de ella de manera imperfecta, y muy parcial. Algunos libros la presentan como una mujer orgullosa, otros insisten en su bondad. Incluso su relacion con Alice de Battenberg es tratada de manera diferente en funcion de los autores. Asi que si tienes una opion, me gustaria leerla.

Un saludo. Konstantinos (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias!

Hola Miguel, un mensaje para informarte que te he creditado en fr:Discussion:Marie de Grèce/Bon article. Muchisimas gracias! Un abrazo, Konstantinos (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marie of Prussia

Hi, I saw that you too was involved in an unpleasant edit war about images on Marie of Prussia's article. User:Huelam987 wants to use without any logical reason that cropped file from a photo depicting the Queen in a bizarre fancy dress for a costume ball in Louis XV style [1][2][3]. I started to think that Huelam987 not only is arrogant - if you look his edits, he always tried to use only files that he personally uploaded on Commons - but ignorant too. About Marie of Prussia for example, he wrote as comments for his edits that the Queen wears a "court dress" (maybe he really don't understand that is a fancy dress, not at all an official XIX century court dress). But maybe he knows it and do it purposely: on Commons there was already another photo of Marie from the same ball, where she is alone, and there are all the correct information about the fancy ball [4]. Why didn't he try to use it? He preferred to upload a new file personally - with a personal idea of Wikipedia - cropped from a photo where she's not alone, without copying the informations about the ball (maybe to pretend that it's a court dress...). On the same article he tried to use this file instead of this one [5], of course because he personally uploaded it on Commons, in spite of the fact that his version is a mirrored file (me and another user tried to correct his file too on Commons, but without results [6] [7]; here you can see a photo taken in the castle where the painting is kept showing the correct orientation [8]). I'm trying to find a solution on Commons, where the problem has been originated, but I really can't follow all his edit wars on every wikipedia pages. Because I'm not a user extremely active here - I come from the Italian wiki - I'm not really used to your help pages, administrator pages etc. Could you please report the problem somewhere? (In general or about the specific current edit war on Marie of Prussia's page). If you have the time to report in general his abuses, you could later write me, so I could personally list a lot of his unpleasant wars (one of the worse was about main image in Louise of Mecklenburg-Strelitz: as you can see on talk page I tried without success to start a public and civil confrontation. But he never replies, not only here. The problem on Louise's page now looks to be resolved. But I'm never sure with him... He could start again here too). Many thanks for your consideration.--Kaho Mitsuki (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC) y 2019 (UTC) =[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia (1863–1919), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peterhof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Archduchess Maria Alice of Austria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archduchess Maria Alice of Austria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archduchess Maria Alice of Austria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaumesnil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernadotte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anastasia of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (1923-1979).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anastasia of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (1923-1979).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations investigation

Hi. I started a copyright violations investigation about your edits, at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Requests section "Miguelemejia". It looks as ifyou have been inserting massive copyright violations for over a decade. Your input at that page is more than welcome. Fram (talk) 10:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your response at my talk page deals with references, not with copyright violations. We are not allowed to copy text from copyrighted sources anywhere on Wikipedia, not in drafts or userspace, nor in articles: and adding a reference to text you have copied doesn't make it less problematic. A short quote, clearly indicated as being a quote, is sometimes acceptable, but that's it. Straigth translations of text are also copyright violations: if the translated text is an article from a Wikipedia version in another language, then this needs to be indicated in an edit summary and on the talk page of the article. See e.g. this edit from 2019 which is a translation of the French Wikipedia article.

Even worse are the times that you copied a text, but very slightly altered it, to make the copyright violation less obvious. By doing this you altered the meaning sometimes quite drastically, creating texts which were unintelligible or wrong. Fram (talk) 08:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 03:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Priest of love film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Priest of love film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kid Galahad (1937) film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kid Galahad (1937) film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buscando a Miguel

The article Buscando a Miguel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Un-notable awards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buscando a Miguel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buscando a Miguel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Grand Duchess Olga and her sisters.jpg

The file File:Grand Duchess Olga and her sisters.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:AOTMA formal 1913.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karl, 5th Prince of Leiningen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karl, 5th Prince of Leiningen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xavier, Duke of Parma.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xavier, Duke of Parma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Archduchess Anna Monika of Austria, Princess of Saxony.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Archduchess Anna Monika of Austria, Princess of Saxony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen, Film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carmen, Film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Private Vices, Public Pleasures.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Private Vices, Public Pleasures.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain.jpg

The file File:Infante Francisco de Paula of Spain.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, redundant to c:File:Francisco de Paula de Borbón.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Gracies and the Birth of Vale Tudo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Gracies and the Birth of Vale Tudo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stilllife by Fede Galizia.jpg

The file File:Stilllife by Fede Galizia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Fede Galizia White Ceramic Bowl with Peaches and Red and Blue Plums.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 13:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTMA.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OTMA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Vera of Russia.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Vera of Russia.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]