User talk:Midgetman3

Welcome!

Hello, Midgetman3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 21:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elmgrove Primary School

I've not done anything with the article as you have requested, but I would ask you how this article qualifies under any Wikipedia criteria, it appears to refer to a completely non notable primary school? Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 21:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it has done things in the community before and I would like to add the community projects and other notable things, some of the other primary school pages are in a worse condition. Many Thanks that you haven't deleted it Midgetman3 (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road character articles

Hello Midgetman3. It's come to my attention that you've been restoring all the Waterloo Road character articles, despite the clear precendent (and at the time on-going discussion) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Tyler (2nd nomination). This is not on, and I am going to nominate all these articles for deletion. You cannot act against consensus, especially when with the majority of these articles you have made no improvement to their in-universe and reference-free state. However, I'd like to offer a suggestion. I have nowhere near the time to do this, but when re-directing the articles I thought what could be useful is a short character profile on each main character (ie. the ones already listed) at List of Waterloo Road characters. This would be far more concise and less likely to get into such an unmanageable state, as long as the profiles are kept short (there are of course a lot of characters to cover). Do consider this suggestion. Thanks, U-Mos (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Fisher and do not act against any agreement made there (or before the discussion is closed). U-Mos (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Do not move articles that have navigational boxes on them if you don't also fix the new article names on those navboxes. You moved Harry Fisher, a Basketball Hall of Fame member's page who will always, forever and ever be more notable than a stupid character on a show, and then you never even bothered to update the new Harry A. Fisher article name on all eight of the navboxes. Stop it. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, Jrcla2, this User hasn't responded in a while so I don't think they are here anymore, and if you read the discussion there was about the TV character, you would see why. I have saw Wikipedians move pages and not edit the moved page and the page has been moved to make way for a different (possibly) more notable pages, so I think your comment here to Midgetman3 is a bit strong. Chatterbox2000 (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Connoisseur's Bakery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connoisseur's Bakery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connoisseur's Bakery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]