User talk:MickeyMouse5349

References

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 04:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MickeyMouse5349, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Adding sources

Dear MickeyMouse5349:

I received your e-mail, although next time just leave a message here on this talk page on Wikipedia and I will see it.

Your message said that there are plenty of magazines which recognize the WindowsWear Awards. I presume that you mean that they've written about the awards. That's good to hear, because it means that the article will be accepted when it is complete. As the author of the article, and also probably someone in the fashion industry who knows where to look, it is up to you to find articles written by the journalists in these magazines (rather than ads or press releases written by WindowsWear) and add references to these specific articles to your page about the awards. Then you can submit the article again.

By the way, while looking for the article about the awards, I came across another article about WindowsWear itself. It will be coming up for review by another reviewer. Please check it to make sure that it is written in a neutral tone, not as an advertisement, and that it doesn't contain any text which has been copied from another web site (for copyright reasons). —Anne Delong (talk) 22:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MickeyMouse5349. You have new messages at QuantifiedElf's talk page.
Message added 23:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

QuantifiedElf (talk) 23:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MickeyMouse5349. You have new messages at QuantifiedElf's talk page.
Message added 21:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

QuantifiedElf (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Display window. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kilopi (talk) 07:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MickeyMouse5349, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--bonadea contributions talk 13:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 1#OTRS pending since June. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC WindowsWear was accepted

WindowsWear, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Libby norman (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WindowsWear

Hi MickeyMouse5349, just to let you know that I've passed this article after removing stuff that wasn't adequately sourced. I've indicated where additional references are needed if you can find them. If these aren't found the sections with the citations needed flag might be removed by another editor. For future reference, you shouldn't remove an article's history – specifically any previous rejection notices. It's far better to work to improve, incorporating previous editors' suggestions, and then press resubmit when you are ready. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WindowsWear

The article WindowsWear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH big time

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Logical Cowboy. I greatly reduced the amount of information and kept the article clean and crisp. I also added additional sources of evidence to suggest the notability about the subject. Please let me know what you think. MickeyMouse5349 (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to WindowsWear. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WindowsWear for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WindowsWear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WindowsWear until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Logical Cowboy. I greatly reduced the amount of information and kept the article clean and crisp. I also added additional sources of evidence to suggest the notability about the subject. Please let me know what you think. MickeyMouse5349 (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mannequin, you may be blocked from editing. K6ka (talk | contribs) 23:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards

Hello MickeyMouse5349. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "WindowsWear Awards".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WindowsWear Awards}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]