User talk:Michihiro Yumoto Soga

Hello, Michihiro Yumoto Soga, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Michihiro Yumoto Soga, good luck, and have fun. Fettlemap (talk) 19:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville article

Hi Michihiro. You seem fairly passionate regarding the CoreCivic issue, but you are editing against a consensus of other editors. Please take this issue to the Talk:Nashville, Tennessee discussion page if you want to develop a consensus with others. Your edits are not being reverted without thought or consideration, but have been done by myself and others because they do not fit with the standards of this article, city articles in general, and the overall encyclopedic tone we're striving for. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andover, Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Aripiprazole shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Craig. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unitary state

Hey, can you please stop adding all over the place and maybe get some consensus at the relevant WikiProject? It seems redundant to me, given that most countries are, and it just adds to the blue link salad already found in most ledes for country articles. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Get consensus at respective country articles, before implementing changes. GoodDay (talk) 01:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at France. Despite drmies' friendly advice, you are continuing to make the same changes to articles. Take this as a final warning. You must not re-impose a change that others have reverted. If you do so again, I will block you. Read WP:BRD and abide by its advice very carefully in future. 01:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC) DDStretch (talk) 01:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]