User talk:Michifoo07

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Audrey Hepburn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't remove advice to editors, and don't revert to your own preference without reliable sources or seeking a new consensus on the Talk page. We've been through this loop too many times for it to be anything other than utterly boring. Talk page, please. Rodhull andemu 00:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Audrey Hepburn, you may be blocked from editing. MarnetteD | Talk 22:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Audrey Hepburn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ella was her mother's name; read the article. Rodhull andemu 22:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Audrey Hepburn. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 22:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tracy Dimarco

The article Tracy Dimarco has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:0BepGol6l.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:0BepGol6l.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]