User talk:Michieliosios

Welcome!

Hello, Michieliosios, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Michael Bruins, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Singularity42 (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Bruins

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kills in 24

The article Kills in 24 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page based entirely on unnotable trivia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Motorsport

Hi Michieliosios. I notice you have created and edited numerous articles related to motorsport. You may be interested in the activities of the Motorsport WikiProject, the Formula One WikiProject and/or the Sports Car Racing WikiProject. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 02:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Augusto Caraceni

Hello, Michieliosios. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Augusto Caraceni, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Augusto Caraceni to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bruno Gavazzoli) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bruno Gavazzoli, Michieliosios!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work, but we need at least one source. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Erm, nevermind, accidentally copied that from the previous page. Good page. No issues.Sulfurboy (talk) 03:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tommy Wisdom

Hi, I'm Verdict78. Michieliosios, thanks for creating Tommy Wisdom!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating the article about Tommy Wisdom. I have suggested that the article needs more references. The section that could do with improvement is the racing results section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Verdict78 (talk) 11:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noé Cecchetti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Noé Cecchetti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nomian (talk) 20:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Balthasar

Hello, Michieliosios. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sebastian Balthasar, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sebastian Balthasar to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 00:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Madero Street Circuit

Español:

Estimado Michieliosios:

Yo he estado allí. Corregí el número de curvas. (Aunque son 13). Consigue Inkscape, es libre. Las imágenes svg son mejores. Cuando ménos, hazlo transparente.

Saludos:

English:

Dear Michieliosios:

I've been there. I corrected the number of curves. (Although they are 13). Get Inkscape is free. The svg images are better. At least do it transparent.

greetings:

Girardelli G.Escucho 19:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Michieliosios. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ecurie Belgique moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ecurie Belgique, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scuderia Franera moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scuderia Franera, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scuderia Franera (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the subject of the article is likely notable for having competed in Formula 1, the article does not demonstrate notability by providing references to secondary sources discussing the team. These sources would likely help add inline citations to the companies history in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scuderia Franera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 18:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michieliosios! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 18:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecurie Belgique (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent significant coverage listed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ecurie Belgique and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 2003 Formula One World Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launch control. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987 Formula One World Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Displacement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 1993 Formula One World Championship

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1993 Formula One World Championship, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1970 Formula One season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Differential and Misfire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scuderia Franera

Hello, Michieliosios. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scuderia Franera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ecurie Belgique

Hello, Michieliosios. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ecurie Belgique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1962 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Downpour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scuderia Franera

Hello, Michieliosios. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scuderia Franera".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ecurie Belgique

Hello, Michieliosios. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ecurie Belgique".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1958 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1956 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puncture.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1953 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OSCA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1952 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page André Simon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1951 Formula One season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page André Simon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Acceleration at Portimão for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Acceleration at Portimão is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Acceleration at Portimão until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brands Hatch Racing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brands Hatch Racing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brands Hatch Racing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]