User talk:Michell Debua
April 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hero's journey have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is not original research. This book Stevenson. If you will provide a link I'll put it on, no problem - Michell Debua
What's the problem with the quote? Or do not you like Stevenson? Michell Debua (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- It is original research and it is transparently spam to direct traffic to a blog providing PDFs of books. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Considering that this brand new account, User:Marco Jovani and User:Michel Sher are all adding the exact same content to the exact same articles you should familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia guidelines pertaining to sockpuppetry as well as WP:SPAM. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- What's the rule about age of account are you referring to? Information check, references authoritative sources and neutral.-User:Michel Sher
- Three new accounts making the same kind of edits. No coincidence. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michel Sher. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'm a fan of pirates tradition. That's all. It is my motivation. So what problems with "Treasure Island"? Or may be you are a Stevenson hater? You have to remember about the rules of Wiki. They are common to all members of community! There are no rules about account age. Some time ago you also had a new account, so what? User:Michel Debua
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michel Sher. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- There are rules about using multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors which is what you are doing by pretending that multiple people are adding the same content. It is just you spamming your website. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- You want to say that if we have different age accounts we have different rights on Wikipedia? Who told you that? Please show what is the rule on Wikipedia, you now refer. - Michel Debua
- There are rules about using multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors which is what you are doing by pretending that multiple people are adding the same content. It is just you spamming your website. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nobody said anything even similar to that. I am trying to assume good faith here but it increasingly appears that you are intentionally dissembling by refuting arguments that were never made in the first place. What has been stated clearly is that it is against Wikipedia policy to use multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors. You are using multiple accounts with different names to create the illusion that more than a single person is adding the same text and links to the same blog in multiple articles. This is sockpuppetry and it is not allowed. Justeditingtoday (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not only I have a new account. There is a whole fan club of Robert Louis Stevenson. And they all plan to register on Wikipedia on the coming week. Wikipedia is an open encyclopedia for anyone. And you decide who to write and who not to write. We all have the same rules. Who violates the rules he writes for Wikipedia. Who complies with the rules, regardless of age has the same rights as you. But if you break the rules, you will be issued a complaint and most likely will be taken measures, because you did not create the encyclopedia and not you set the rules here. If someone does not like the rules of Wikipedia, you have one option - to create your Wikipedia. And while you are a part of this community you will obey the rules of Wikipedia, or you won't be here. - Michel Debua
- Nobody said anything even similar to that. I am trying to assume good faith here but it increasingly appears that you are intentionally dissembling by refuting arguments that were never made in the first place. What has been stated clearly is that it is against Wikipedia policy to use multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors. You are using multiple accounts with different names to create the illusion that more than a single person is adding the same text and links to the same blog in multiple articles. This is sockpuppetry and it is not allowed. Justeditingtoday (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Threatening to create an army of sockpuppets and meatpuppets will only get you blocked. Your edits under your various names have been reverted by multiple editors because they don't belong here. They are original research and spam. If you continue to create new socks and add the same links you risk your website becoming blacklisted. Justeditingtoday (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)