User talk:Michaelsbll
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Michaelsbll. |
|
June 2008
[edit]Thanks for experimenting with the page Alexa Vega on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. NrDg 02:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to New Mexico, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Michaelsbll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - Enuja (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to American Alligator has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
April 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your last two edits do not reflect the type of editing you have done on here so far. Please review Wiki's policies, as well as what is acceptable grammar, and try again. Atlantabravz (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jennette McCurdy, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Lee County, IL
[edit]If you read the refs at the Lee County, IL article, it wasn't Robert that it was named after, it was Henry Lee III. Why are you changing this? --Funandtrvl (talk) 04:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
[edit]Your recent edit to the page Snowmobile appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 07:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Decompression sickness, you may be blocked from editing. RexxS (talk) 00:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kate Todd, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kate Todd. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Warren actually did become Chief Justice before being nominated and confirmed. This is permissible under a recess appointment; Eisenhower used one to put Warren on the Court immediately following Vinson's death, and formally nominated Warren several months later. This is confirmed by the Federal Judicial Center biography of Earl Warren. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Watts Riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Impound (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Richard Dreyfuss
[edit]This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with this edit to Richard Dreyfuss, you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
[edit]Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gigi Rice, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intercity bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cannibalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laryngitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaporizer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stearns County, Minnesota, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 22:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject U2 invitation
[edit]Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!
You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!
Project U2 member list
|
---|
|
–pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Union school district may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]I notice you tend not to give edit summaries of the changes you make. Please read WP:UNRESPONSIVE Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 22:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Cat in the Hat (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | cinematography = [[Emmanuel Lub
- | distributor = [[Universal Studios|Universal Pictures]]<br />[[DreamWorks|DreamWorks Pict
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geep. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calamity Jane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Also in late 1876 or 1878, Jane nursed the victims of a [[smallpox]] epidemic in the Deadwood area.{{citation needed|date=June 2014} cite book Estelline Bennett, Old Deadwood Days, Lincoln, Nebraska &
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
January 2015
[edit]Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Hi, Michaelsbll. I notice that you've been asked several times now to use edit summaries (January 2009 and July 2013). I want to reiterate the importance of this. I haven't spotted any edit summaries you've used at all but if you've used them, you've certainly used very very few for any of your 5000+ edits, and it appears like none in the last 500 edits. As of this writing you most recently made 7 edits to the List of Austin Powers characters article. I manually inspected them. All those edits seem pointless to me and without an explanation I do not see your motivation for making them. (If you think you were fixing some grammar issues, I would have to disagree. If you think you were fixing style, I would still disagree.) I reviewed a sample of your other edits and they appear to largely consist of similar "shuffling" of the wording (replacing a word with a synonym, and so on) for no apparent reason. This seems of little to no value to me and is more disruptive than beneficial. Please start communicating with your fellow editors.
PS Also I notice you don't mark your minor changes. Please start doing this too. If you have any questions, or if there are extenuating circumstances that prevent you from doing this things, please somehow let us know.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jason Quinn (talk) 12:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Walker (American politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Egan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
bare vs expose and forbid vs prohibit
[edit]In the Nude swimming article you changed "bare" to "expose" and "forbid" to "prohibit". Bare and forbid are both good English words of English origin, expose and prohibit are both of Latin roots. My view is that words of English origin are always better than Latin words. What was your reason for changing good simple English words to fancy Latin words? Wayne Jayes (talk) 11:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sasha Pieterse, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization Talk 04:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
WP:Edit warring at the Shemale article
[edit]Stop it. You have been reverted by multiple editors at the Shemale article for valid reasons. When you disagree in such a case, you should take the matter to the article talk page, not continue to WP:Edit war or otherwise edit WP:Disruptively. Continue to edit this way, and you will be WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you've been copyediting the article. While I don't object to the changes, they do seem kind of arbitrary. Unless you have the sources on hand, you have to be careful that you aren't changing the meanings as different words can have nuanced connotations. For example, you changed "intense lighting" to "extreme lighting", which changes the meaning from "just some harsh lighting" to "Kubrick using the sun". Also "derives" was a much more appropriate word in the other sentence. Just something to consider. Opencooper (talk) 03:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Now I do object to these changes. Please stop changing making arbitrary copyedits unless you have read the source or if you're only going to modify the grammar. In English, different words have different meanings and even synonyms can have different tones and connotations. Opencooper (talk) 10:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Michaelsbll. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Michaelsbll. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rhoda Griffis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Michaelsbll. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Grammar
[edit]This edit of yours introduced bad grammar. The term "speaking with" includes the idea that the other party is also speaking. In the film, Wilson doesn't speak (he's a volleyball.) Binksternet (talk) 06:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Binksternet: This is a long-term issue with this user. I mentioned it back in 2016, but a large part of their edits are just arbitrary word substitutions, where they subtly change the meaning of entire sentences without even considering the original sources or whether the words they use have the same connotations. On the surface it seems innocuous, but this isn't "copyediting" and the long-term effects are going to be pretty insidious. Michaelsbll, I suggest dropping the thesaurus and instead reading Wikipedia:Basic copyediting. You don't need to change something just because it sounds wrong personally to you or is against your own usage of English.
- Amazingly, they've been an editor since 2007. They don't seem to engage on talk pages at all though (other than doing stuff like this), so I don't foresee them changing their ways. Opencooper (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Looking more closely, I'm horrified at the scale of the problem. There's certainly a WP:CIR aspect, and the lack of communication is serious. Binksternet (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at August 7, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already? 16:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]The article The Lion King: The Brightest Star has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced since 2019, nothing found via WP:BEFORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)